Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Scythian; KarlInOhio
Let's look at the facts before this thread becomes out of control (or was that too late even by the time of the OP?)

1. There aren't “numerous patents” from the flier or anywhere on this thread. There's one, and it's from 1990. Here's a heads up too, there are plenty of nutty ideas that have been patented; the only thing you need to get a patent is an original idea. The idea doesn't necessarily have to *work* though, or even be feasible.

2. As was pointed out by Karl in Ohio way back in post #14 (a HUNDRED posts ago, which apparently you are still ignoring), 4,160,000 micrograms per liter (mcg/L) is the equivalent of 4.16 GRAMS of aluminum per every liter of water. Do you realize how incredible that sounds? Yes, there is a “BASIC LABS” that exists in Reeding CA, but anyone can CLAIM to have tests done by any lab that actually exists. But if this lab actually found 4.16 GRAMS of aluminum per LITER of water in a sample provided to them, and this sample wasn't turbid, was clear, that is it looked like regular water and wasn't OBVIOUSLY contaminated (which it would have been, it WOULD have been noticeably contaminated even by a cursory visual inspection trust me), then this “BASIC LABS” is a very incompetent testing lab indeed, “state certification” or not.

The point is that one wouldn't even need laboratory testing to show that level of contamination; all they'd have to do is show a picture of the water in question. Where's that on the flier?

3. All the rest of the claims on the flier are just that, claims, with no substantiation.

So let's review: we have a flier with ONE (not many, ONE) substantiated “patent” from 1990 about some crazy idea to seed the atmosphere with aluminum oxide particles to “prevent global warming”, and a *claim* that a state certified lab found over 4 GRAMS per liter of aluminum in a water sample, along with all types of other claims about real organizations (but no substantiation thereof) putting such nefarious plans into action.

Dear sir, for the reasons stated in the summary paragraph above, people are laughing at you. I would suggest you calm down and take a good objective look at the reality of the situation. Especially do some research into the “solubility of aluminum oxide”.

148 posted on 02/13/2009 8:06:25 AM PST by FourtySeven (47)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies ]


To: FourtySeven
Patents:

Utility -- 5,146,634 6923014 0000001
Design -- D339,456 D321987 D000152
Plant -- PP08,901 PP07514 PP00003
Reissue -- RE35,312 RE12345 RE00007
Defensive Publication -- T109,201 T855019 T100001
Statutory Invention Registration -- H001,523 H001234 H000001
Re-examination -- RX29,194 RE29183 RE00125
Additional Improvement -- AI00,002 AI000318 AI00007


This is but a tip of the iceberg
168 posted on 02/13/2009 8:20:23 AM PST by Scythian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 148 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson