Replies

Patents:

Utility -- 5,146,634 6923014 0000001
Design -- D339,456 D321987 D000152
Plant -- PP08,901 PP07514 PP00003
Reissue -- RE35,312 RE12345 RE00007
Defensive Publication -- T109,201 T855019 T100001
Statutory Invention Registration -- H001,523 H001234 H000001
Re-examination -- RX29,194 RE29183 RE00125
Additional Improvement -- AI00,002 AI000318 AI00007

This is but a tip of the iceberg

I live in the Upstate of SC...we see these on a daily basis and it seems on some days there are double and triple the norm of these. They are so noticeable that a local talk show host even mentions them from time and time and speculates on their purpose.

We were at a neighborhood outdoor cookout one night, summer evening, clear skies. The guy who lives next door to us used to be in the air force, flew fighter planes. Out of no where he cocks his head to one side and asked everyone to be quiet. Maybe 1 minute later he said "You see 'um?"...trails at night and we asked him what those were, that we see these things all the time. He said, "They're flying them again."...all he would say. It kind of stuck with me but he never did really say much about it. But we always notice them and wonder why there are so many in the skies over our area.

I saw this link upthread; that’s why I said “one patent” was mentioned in the flyer.

This is ONE patent. Show me others.

I also forgot to talk about the bills in Congress in my OP on this thread. Let me help you out here a bit. First of all, go here: http://thomas.loc.gov/home/multicongress/multicongress.html and enter the term “Weather Modification”. Click on “Include Variants”. You’ll get a lot of hits back. However, if you read the bills in question (and note, not all of these are laws, these are the record of bills, so it’s not even certain they have passed yet), you will see that they discuss ways to mitigate the effects of severe weather. Specifically droughts in the Senate bill mentioned in the flier. (1807).

This is nothing new. In fact, I just saw a program about cloud seeding on the Discovery channel a few days ago. I believe they used flares that seeded clouds with zinc oxide (not aluminum oxide). Also, the concentration in the air was much lower than anything like 4 grams/liter. Not to mention water (since as you probably know now, if you took my previous advice, aluminum/zinc/transition metal oxides are mostly IN-soluble in water, so it would be IMPOSSIBLE to contaminate water with such sources of such metals). But I digress.

The Senate bill mentioned in the flier is nothing more nefarious than a bill requesting funding for such projects to be increased. And what “projects” are we talking about? Seeding clouds.

SEEDING CLOUDS. That is, you’d need clouds ALREADY FORMED to seed. It wouldn’t be done on a clear day/in clear skies.

And why are the clouds being seeded? To cause rain in drought stricken areas! Is this a bad thing? Could it be a bad thing? Given that the seeds are quite, QUITE insoluble in water, and thus cannot be a source of contamination?

Dear sir, like all conspiracy theories, there are grains of truth intermixed with outright lies and paranoia in this. I suggest you put your obvious energies to better use, fighting real evils like the Obama Porkulus bill, and quit trying to deprive drought stricken people of rain.