Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sick of popups? Sick of banner ads? Sick of third party cookies? -- a suggestion
1/26/2009 | Vanity

Posted on 01/26/2009 2:59:32 AM PST by markomalley

If you don't like going to Drudge and dealing with popups or getting tracked by third party cookies, I would suggest that you visit the following site:

Blocking Unwanted Parasites with a Hosts File

This site maintains an updated "HOSTS" file that has a pretty comprehensive list of known ad and spyware sites and will cause your browser to not go to those sites if the page you are loading wants to get a banner ad, popup ad, webbug, or third party tracking cookie. The list of blocked sites is updated about once a month.

How does it work? When you type in "www.freerepublic.com" or "www.drudgereport.com," your computer first has to resolve that web URL to an IP address. It does this by first going to a file on your computer called the "HOSTS" file to see if there is a match and then goes to a server on the Internet called a "Domain Name Service" file.

The HOSTS file looks like this extract:

127.0.0.1 a.abnad.net
127.0.0.1 b.abnad.net
127.0.0.1 c.abnad.net #[eTrust.Tracking.Cookie]
127.0.0.1 d.abnad.net
127.0.0.1 e.abnad.net
127.0.0.1 t.abnad.net
127.0.0.1 z.abnad.net
127.0.0.1 banners.absolpublisher.com
127.0.0.1 tracking.absolstats.com
127.0.0.1 adv.abv.bg
127.0.0.1 bimg.abv.bg
127.0.0.1 www2.a-counter.kiev.ua
127.0.0.1 track.acclaimnetwork.com
127.0.0.1 accuserveadsystem.com

If you have a URL listed in the HOSTS file, it will automatically resolve to the corresponding IP address. You'll note that the above URLs all resolve to 127.0.0.1 -- 127.0.0.1 is the standard address for your local computer. So, what this file does, in essence, is to tell your browser to not do anything at all when it sees one of the URL listed in the HOSTS file.

Pretty comprehensive instructions for updating your HOSTS file are in the page I link to, above. There are special instructions for dealing with Vista and getting around various security software (such as Norton and Zone Alarm). Please read the instructions before actually doing the update.

Hope the above is of value to folks.


TOPICS: Computers/Internet
KEYWORDS: hosts; privacy; tech
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-53 last
To: tubebender
I have done that but I still get a pop under for Netflix and am curious where I am getting that. I suspect it is Drudge...

it is... but a pop-under is not anywhere near as annoying as pop-up ads...

41 posted on 01/26/2009 8:24:01 AM PST by Swordmaker (Remember, the proper pronunciation of IE is "AAAAIIIIIEEEEEEE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

Uh, aside from a web browser, can you name another application that would make requests to ad sites?


42 posted on 01/26/2009 8:24:26 AM PST by joseph20 (...to ourselves and our Posterity...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: JerseyHighlander
I've used an Ad Blocking host file for years. The one you linked HostsMan works great.
43 posted on 01/26/2009 8:26:53 AM PST by McGruff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: MediaMole; Beeline; ShadowAce

^^ Raises Hand ^^

Another vote for Firefox’s extentions, NoScript and AdBlockPlus. Have both, and they work great.

Concur about shutting off the notifications, or some sites will drive you nuts! :)


44 posted on 01/26/2009 8:35:45 AM PST by brityank (The more I learn about the Constitution, the more I realise this Government is UNconstitutional !!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Swordmaker

You said — “In Safari, all you have to do is click “Block Pop-up Windows” under the Safari Menu. I haven’t seen a pop-up ad in years. You can also turn on Private Browsing...”

I do have that selected (not the private browsing...). But, there are a very few that still get through that blocker. It still has happened with me (maybe about 1/4 of a percent of the time or less...).

The thing that the Hosts file does for you is also block the ads that are on the web pages, not just the pop-ups, though. I haven’t seen that Safari blocks ads on the web page itself, like the list that is provided with the Hostal program. There’s a whole bunch already pre-listed for you and you can ad more as you go along. At any time, you can “turn off” the Hosts file (so to speak) and then turn it back on.

For some reason I found that I had something in that list which blocked my Software Update from functioning properly. I might have done it myself, or it may have been in the list. So, when I do a Software Update, I just turn off the Hosts file (through the program Hostal).

It does have its uses...


45 posted on 01/26/2009 8:44:25 AM PST by Star Traveler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: DieHard the Hunter
Just take note...
Editors Note: in most cases a large HOSTS file (over 135 kb) tends to slow down the machine. This only occurs in W2000/XP/Vista. Windows 98 and ME are not affected.
I used this technique with Windows ME, which iw probably why I didn't get as exceited about Win XP as many others did.
46 posted on 01/26/2009 10:32:41 AM PST by Gondring (Paul Revere would have been flamed as a naysayer troll and told to go back to Boston.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: joseph20; All
Uh, aside from a web browser, can you name another application that would make requests to ad sites?

Sure. Any number of freeware applications:

I could go on, but the point is that a whole BUNCH of applications can request network access...and can report your usage...even if you don't think of them necessarily as web browsers.

47 posted on 01/26/2009 10:44:54 AM PST by markomalley (Extra ecclesiam nulla salus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Gondring; DieHard the Hunter
I used this technique with Windows ME, which iw probably why I didn't get as exceited about Win XP as many others did.

From my experience, it becomes an issue particularly when a machine doesn't have an adequate amount of RAM. Otherwise, it shouldn't be a concern too much.

48 posted on 01/26/2009 10:47:56 AM PST by markomalley (Extra ecclesiam nulla salus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Gondring

The hosts file is a simple and effective layer of security to add to most computers. The size of the hosts file will in some cases impact performance. I have used a hosts file on a number of Windows 98, Windows 2000 Pro and Windows XP Pro computers. Only the Windows 2000 Pro computers bogged down.


49 posted on 01/26/2009 11:00:21 AM PST by TexasRepublic (I am inconsolate over the death of our country.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Beeline
3 words:

Firefox

Noscript

Adblock

Run that for a while and you'll be like me, asking are websites still using popups?

50 posted on 01/26/2009 3:27:47 PM PST by zeugma (Will it be nukes or aliens? Time will tell.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

A weak strategy towards popups,banner ads and third party cookies. Not comprehensive.

Come on man!
Give it a break this HOSTS file setup is perpetually out of date and is not robust enough to work as a solid solution
to a great many of these and greater problems.


51 posted on 01/26/2009 3:44:59 PM PST by Beeline
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Beeline
A weak strategy towards popups,banner ads and third party cookies. Not comprehensive.

If that was the only thing I was doing within my network, you'd be right.

Give it a break this HOSTS file setup is perpetually out of date and is not robust enough to work as a solid solution to a great many of these and greater problems.

They say that virus definitions are out of date before they are pushed out...doesn't mean that we shouldn't use an antivirus program. You know that vulnerabilities are usually not published on bugtraq until after the vendor has a patch. Doesn't mean we shouldn't look at bugtraq.

You choose not to use the HOSTS file hack on your system, that's your business. Not my network. But if you deride me for using a layer 3 solution when, apparently, you are putting all of your eggs in a layer 7 basket (and one that isn't even comprehensive beyond mozilla apps), you'll forgive me if I choose not to take your advice.

52 posted on 01/26/2009 5:28:55 PM PST by markomalley (Extra ecclesiam nulla salus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: markomalley
Speaking about tracking your usage, one of the worst/best (depending on your opinion) is Google. Even FR submits every page to Google-analytics ("View Source" - at bottom of html):

My No-Script has it blocked off; not because of FR, but all the other sites that use it. Google has already said they use it to 'target' the information they feed back to you on info searches you do, and I personally resent that. JMHO.

53 posted on 01/27/2009 10:26:18 PM PST by brityank (The more I learn about the Constitution, the more I realise this Government is UNconstitutional !!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-53 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson