I didn’t say Sharia law in the US. What I am talking about is this, Carolyn believes that people should be able to worship as they feel...and anyone who says anything about it ...well..glass houses yada yada yada.
So, Odinga believes in Strict Islamic law which includes Sharia law.
It would be illegal in the US...but it may not be illegal in Africa. So her argument stands no matter the country. They should be able to worship how the see fit..which includes murdering family members.
Or the people who believe in mutilating women is acceptable because that is part of their faith.
Etc.
It is not a straw man argument.
Chick, in regards to your post #339, you've been around FR long enough to know this forum's etiquette is to ping a person you speak about in a post. I don't need you to tell me what Carolyn (or any other poster) believes. She can tell me herself if she so desires.
As I've already noted, I didn't expect to get through to you with my post about the relevant constitutional issues. Even so, you serve as a perfect foil for reaching a larger audience and making the point that not all conservatives are crazed uber-negative fools.
BTW, your debating style is a typical bait-and-switch approach used so that you can keep your irrational argument going. Doesn't work with me.
The central issue of this discussion remains the same one I called you on yesterday. People with your stone-cold, intolerant heart and rabid vitriol give conservatism a bad name. The great man whose name you took for your screen handle would be utterly repulsed by your posts on this thread.