Chick, in regards to your post #339, you've been around FR long enough to know this forum's etiquette is to ping a person you speak about in a post. I don't need you to tell me what Carolyn (or any other poster) believes. She can tell me herself if she so desires.
As I've already noted, I didn't expect to get through to you with my post about the relevant constitutional issues. Even so, you serve as a perfect foil for reaching a larger audience and making the point that not all conservatives are crazed uber-negative fools.
BTW, your debating style is a typical bait-and-switch approach used so that you can keep your irrational argument going. Doesn't work with me.
The central issue of this discussion remains the same one I called you on yesterday. People with your stone-cold, intolerant heart and rabid vitriol give conservatism a bad name. The great man whose name you took for your screen handle would be utterly repulsed by your posts on this thread.
Answer this question,
ArizonaCarolyn claims that everyone should be allowed to worship as they see fit and anyone who questions it is living in a glass house...yada yada yada..
Are you saying that you should only be allowed to worhip as you see fit..in the US where the constitution governs?
Glass houses are a moral argument..not a constitutional argument.