Posted on 09/04/2008 7:30:21 PM PDT by KoRn
They have disrupted McCain's speech several times.
I've never seen anything like this during a convention. I wonder how they managed to get in.
To me this is scary. What if these people were there to do something other than shout?
I'm sure these people will be the headline on MSNBC and the New York Times....
everytime a code punk appears on the teevee, disrupting something, it’s another thousand votes for mccain. good thing they don’t realize this. they, like olberman, were born of the wrong orifice.
Those people need the wood shampoo. Bad.
they did the same thing at President Bush’s 4 years ago!
I totally agree. I have no problem at all with protesters, but inside a party convention DURING an acceptance speech isn't the place.
I hope those disgraceful freaks were water boarded and had panties put on their heads(they might actually enjoy that) when they were brought off camera.
I hope you’re right. I wonder if the average viewer knows it was the Pinkos. They might mistakingly think the crazies were the ones chanting USA! USA!
Surprise. There were Democrats who infiltrated the GOP this year. They crossed over to vote for McCain (not out of any love, just to keep the GOP from nominating a conservative) and there are those Democrats who crossed over to vote for Ron Paul.
The Ron Paulians worked their way up at the state conventions held after the primaries. Guess who probably gave the Code Pinko communists their access badges. The badges should be tied to who provided them and the names deserve to be published so that America can interview them on nightly tv.
The witches have NO right to disrupt the Convention and claim “free speech”. The GOP is GUARANTEED the right to peaceful assembly and these Communist outbursts are a violation of the Republicans’ rights.
And one of the Leftist lawyers defending those charged with terrorism in St. Paul said that the GOP made no file for public assembly and that is a strategy he is considering in defending his clients who are up on conspiracy to riot charges.
One of the creeps also said that they weren’t coordinators, they were “assisting” coordinators. Congratulations, that makes you a coordinator.
"'The DOD definition of terrorism is "the calculated use of violence or the threat of violence to inculcate fear; intended to coerce or to intimidate governments or societies in the pursuit of goals that are generally political, religious, or ideological.'"
[http://www.terrorism.com/modules.php?op=modload&name=News&file=article&sid=5671]
The media.
I don't recall protesters in the hall during Bush's speech 4 years ago. Of course my memory doesn't get better with time. lol
it would be nice if, just occasionally, the law were actually enforced. 90 days in a county lockup, preferably a tank cell, would alter their perceptions and larn ‘em some manners, methinks.
In Chicago, these people are referred to as "Community Organizers"....
Send ‘em to Guantanamo and throw away the key. They’re no better than terrorists and enemy combatants.
Every single Ron Paul voter I know personally is conservative; I don't know any of these liberal Ron Paulians. I am quite aware they are out there in great numbers, doing exactly what you wrote, but please don't broadbrush conservatives in with those slime.
The FEC has laws against intimidating voters and supporters of candidates. There should be no hostility within the GOP convention and a disruption of this sort is a violation of political rights.
Notice how hate crime laws scope every democraphic of the Left but allow you to harass, vandalize, and assault Republicans without additional charge?
There were also some yutes who defaced a Catholic church in St. Paul this week. No mention of this hate crime in the national news. Wonder why. If a mosque had been defiled it would’ve gotten national coverage.
“90 days in a county lockup...”
Will make them a celebrity. I’ve gone to presentations where the featured activists’ only claim to fame is their jail time. Trust me, they’d love to be arrested for 90 days.
Oh please you MUST have read some of the chatter from the Left who wanted to keep Ron Paul in the debates and then attempted to hijack the state conventions.
This is not to say that everyone who voted for Ron Paul fell into that camp but there was a national concerted effort to do so.
Who else but a Democrat would go through the delegate process to give prime tickets to Code Stink? You think these really were “disgruntled” Republicans as the press has called them? RINO Republicans maybe.
It is like the myth of conservatives for Obama. Conservative Marxists. Yep.
Cupped hands strike over the ears.
Kidney strike while they’re thinking that one over.
http://buzzfeed.com/buzz/Democrats_for_Ron_Paul
BuzzFeeds Links
1The Rationale behind a Democrat for Ron Paul
andrewsullivan.theatlantic.com
2Ron Paul Supporters Inundate the CNN Forums
politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com
3Ron Paul Was the Most Searched-for Person on Technorati
waitingfordorothy.blogspot.com
4Why Hillary is better than Ron Paul
dailykos.com
5Ron Paul was an early dissident of the Iraq War
messagejury.com
6Nevermind Polling or Fundraising - Look to the Internet for the Ron Paul Effect
freedomdemocrats.org
7What do anti-war Democrats and Ron Paul have in common?
blog.lordsutch.com
8A List of Comments about Ron Paul on MSNBC (before they get deleted)
blog.mises.org
9The left takes notice of Ron Paul
conservativetimes.org
10Does Ron Paul Deserve to Be Alone? Yeah, Probably
inadequate.net
11Ron Pauls Success Hinges on How Much Sh*ttier the Iraq War Gets
freedomdemocrats.org
12Why Democrats Should Join the Ron Paul Movement
jasonekirk.blogspot.com
13Ron Paul is awesome! (sarcasm)
dailykos.com
14Ron Paul, A Republican Democrats Could Love? Watch His Debate Answers
tpmcafe.com
Code Stink forges press passes, much simpler than the vast Ron Paul conspiracy you’re spinning.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.