I'll bet she and Todd are ready to fix that anytime:
Cheers!
Posted on 08/30/2008 10:34:44 PM PDT by Rca2000
It did NOT take long for the left to smear Sarah Palin, who has re-ignited the conservative base like no one has since the Reagan days--and appears to be ready to pull a LOT of PUMA's and others from the Dem side.
The thing is:: Since they have little to go after her for in reality--they are now suggesting something SURE to enrage nearly ALL women across America::And that is--Sarah's latest child is NOT hers--but her daughters!!
This, is, of course, designed to show that she is just a "hypocrite" and was too ashamed to admit her daughters unwed pregnancy. Also they are saying her oldest son was conceived before she was married.
ALL of this is designed to "turn off" the "values voters" and taint her image as a "rising star" in Conservative politics.
However--sinking to such LOW levels will most likely backfire badly!! As a conservative I do NOT care if Sarah was pregnant before she was married, at least she got married and had her child. And I do NOT believe she would "fake her daughters pregnancy" either--so what if her daughter was pregnant?? How would that hurt HER??
Keep on smearing Kos and DU. If this is all you have...Obama will be lucky to carry five states, by the time you enrage women out there, like this will most likely do!!
Blogger here reports seeing a very pregnant Sarah Palin in april. Game over libtards.
I wouldn’t get too worked up over this.
It’s so absurd that the only people it makes look bad are the people spreading this story. It will disgust any normal person.
We should just ignore it. It doesn’t even dignify a response, to respond to it in any way would lend it more credence than it deserves.
I'll bet she and Todd are ready to fix that anytime:
Cheers!
This is the stupidest “smear” I have ever heard of before. First, because it is so obviously and provably false, but second, because even if it WERE true, it would not make Palin look bad anyway! Adopting her disabled grandchild would be a responsible act, no matter whether her daughter had behaved stupidly or was a victim, it still would be a good deed on Palin’s part so why would anyone care about this. Good grief.
I have noticed that the moonbats often confuse movies and TV shows with reality.
“You do know the entire text was NOT from me, but from someone on the DU?”
yes, I knew that - I’m just still new enough to this board that I didn’t know how else to post a reply - sorry :-)))
Not a problem. Gotta be careful quoting liberals, sometimes people mistake their words for your own.
Declaring this after mentioning the "baby's body", its DNA and its blood-type doesn't even make any sense. Does he/she think the DNA is not that of a human? Does he know that pre-born infants have sleep/waking periods that are different levels of consciousness?
According to this poster, it should be legal to violently murder anyone who is unconscious and has different DNA than their mother.
This is another fine example of typical liberal reasoning. They have absolutely no critical thinking skills.
It doesn't matter. He is trying to justify in his shallow mind the reasoning for killing an unborn baby
Deep thought is not permitted, as it will only lead to concluding that he is wrong.
Really! Don’t they realize how terrible this must be for the daughter, who is still in state of shock that her mother was selected as a VP candidate?
“Not a problem. Gotta be careful quoting liberals, sometimes people mistake their words for your own.”
what I try to do with my replies (same with emails) is put a line or two of what I’m responding to, in quotes at the top, so that it references what the previous post contained (since these things end up, often, in random order in a given thread.)
“In regards to their eldest son, he is 18 y.o. The Palin’s just celebrated their 20th wedding anniversary on Friday.”
Oh, but don’t you know, it takes Republicans two years to birth baby- cause they’re elephants.
It also makes more sense that the baby would be Sarah’s. One of the major risks of a late-in-life preganacy is Down’s Syndrome.
I remember being so self conscious at that age. Now she has to worry what half the country thinks about her.
I hope Sarah smacks them all down hard. I have a feeling she will and that it will be ugly. This can only hurt Obama’s chances in the end for his side’s smearing of this poor girl and this fine woman.
I said most of us LOL! Not I!
Very interesting. If I’m figuring this correctly, Jackson would have been 1/8 black - Just like The One. (Assuming this is all true.)
Q. I am borrowing this post and sticking it on alan colmes web site.
From what little I know I don’t believe she has lobtomised any of her family or drowned anyone in her car. I do know she has more experience as CEO of a government that Obamie. She also has a true love for her country.
There a troll of FR who has been supporting the same lie.
I don't know if it is true or not but it doesn't relevant except as an internet rumor. Its kind of funny though. I wonder if we can get someone at msnbc to investigate this.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.