Posted on 08/30/2008 10:34:44 PM PDT by Rca2000
It did NOT take long for the left to smear Sarah Palin, who has re-ignited the conservative base like no one has since the Reagan days--and appears to be ready to pull a LOT of PUMA's and others from the Dem side.
The thing is:: Since they have little to go after her for in reality--they are now suggesting something SURE to enrage nearly ALL women across America::And that is--Sarah's latest child is NOT hers--but her daughters!!
This, is, of course, designed to show that she is just a "hypocrite" and was too ashamed to admit her daughters unwed pregnancy. Also they are saying her oldest son was conceived before she was married.
ALL of this is designed to "turn off" the "values voters" and taint her image as a "rising star" in Conservative politics.
However--sinking to such LOW levels will most likely backfire badly!! As a conservative I do NOT care if Sarah was pregnant before she was married, at least she got married and had her child. And I do NOT believe she would "fake her daughters pregnancy" either--so what if her daughter was pregnant?? How would that hurt HER??
Keep on smearing Kos and DU. If this is all you have...Obama will be lucky to carry five states, by the time you enrage women out there, like this will most likely do!!
Don't give yourself a headache trying to deconstruct the ramblings of the insane.
Forgot to mention in my previous post: With this Auschwitz lie, maybe Senator Zero is suffering from Algorian delusions of grandeur. If so, someone had better tell him that Algore already invented the internet before he tries to claim that one for himself.
That's what this is, a bizarro fable concocted in the putrid imaginings of neo-stalinist mental midgets.
But I ask, considering what these raving troglodytes already believe, is it at all surprising they would believe this?
Actually, being asleep is not the same thing as being unconscious but I agree with your point. If a person gets knocked unconscious, is the person not still a human? That is not the criteria used to determine if a living organism is a human or not. It’s a way for people to fool themselves into rationalizing away abortion.
Looks like the DU finnaly pulled the thread. What about the Koz where this originated from?
This is it???? This is some kind of BIG gun for them? If Sarah did do exactly what they claim....so what? It tells me the woman has integrity unlike the asshats on the left ala John Edwards. These people are mentally ill.
“this sounds like a human being, a person, doesn’t it? your words, not mine - and yet, you end by calling him/her a “fetus” (good clinical term, right?)”
Ummmmmmm You do know the entire text was NOT from me, but from someone on the DU? I was just posting what the person wrote. She was upset that her DU was spreading the lie about Palins baby.
But, but... I thought we were over the politics of personal destruction! (/sarcasm)
This is just the latest example that the Democrats are morally bankrupt.
Slacker! :)
I've got a screen cap of the front page, with this as the #1 story in large type.
You guys know that this was a major plot point in “Desperate Housewives” last season, right? On the show, the conservative female character was ashamed that her daughter was pregnant, so she wore a fake pregnancy getup until such time as her daughter’s baby was born in secret, then claimed the baby as her own.
So, in this case, the libs’ stupidity is matched only by their unoriginality.
Not surprised at all.
- Campaign ad, 1824.
Wow, thats interesting. Obama can't be the first black president, Jackson was. We should start circulating this rumor so the ‘historical’ aura fades from the One.
Looks like kos cleansed the primary thread. When you look around the site you can see that they have a great deal of cleaning yet to do.
That doesn't leave us wondering what you are
Well, well, well, we are now up to Jonathan Swift territory here, satire optional. It's time to suggest using poor babies as food again.
Notice how the lefties consider the BABY's having Down's as being preventable. They mean, it can be killed at 5 months gestation, only a couple of weeks younger than the preemies surviving in the NICU. No one ever talks about the sex being preventable, because the most important thing to liberals is that everyone should rut like rabbits though with absolutely no natural consequences. This is why the abortion issue doesn't make ANY sense to me and never will.
And if the baby is not a separate entity, then there is no such thing as rape. Because a man might be convicted of rape on the basis of his SEPARATE DNA INSIDE HER BODY. If separate DNA inside a woman's body is still counted as that woman, then that rape never happened. That was just her own DNA, and she was just doing what she chose to do with her own body, lying on the sidewalk being penetrated by a stranger with a gun to her head. No big deal.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.