Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: grey_whiskers

So much for “fine tuning.”


36 posted on 08/13/2008 10:37:20 AM PDT by js1138
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: js1138

Now that is a really astonishing leap into absurdity! If the ‘constants’ are changing yet radioactive decay seems to be a consistent rate, don’t you see how that could actually be even more of ‘fine tuning’? Of course you can’t, you’re so nailed to your preconceived notions that there is no sliver of opening for anything different.


37 posted on 08/13/2008 10:58:59 AM PDT by MHGinTN (Believing they cannot be deceived, they cannot be convinced when they are deceived.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]

To: js1138
So much for “fine tuning.” ???

Related to anthropic principle?

39 posted on 08/13/2008 4:20:46 PM PDT by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson