Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: js1138

Now that is a really astonishing leap into absurdity! If the ‘constants’ are changing yet radioactive decay seems to be a consistent rate, don’t you see how that could actually be even more of ‘fine tuning’? Of course you can’t, you’re so nailed to your preconceived notions that there is no sliver of opening for anything different.


37 posted on 08/13/2008 10:58:59 AM PDT by MHGinTN (Believing they cannot be deceived, they cannot be convinced when they are deceived.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]


To: MHGinTN

If physical constants change without ripping the universe apart, then fine tuning is bogus.

The fact that the changes are in the sixth decimal place indicates that radiometric dating is valid. The error bars in dating techniques are several percent, for any single sample.


40 posted on 08/13/2008 4:36:03 PM PDT by js1138
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson