If you read the opinion closely, Hawaii’s statehood status IS nOT the issue. Obama’s parents are the issue.
Obama did not have two parents who were U.S. citizens so the age requirements of his mother kicked in. That’s the sole issue as clearly spelled out in the opinion.
If you're born in the United States, you're a US citizen unless you're the child of a foreign diplomat.
Don't try to practice law without a license.
Irrelevent. He is a natural born U.S. citizen due to the fact that he was born in the United States to a citizen.
Don't have to go to the age of the mother factor, it's done.
Except that the 'opinion' seems to be built on BS. The applicable statute is Section 301 of 8 USC 1401:
The following shall be nationals and citizens of the United States at birth:
(g) a person born outside the geographical limits of the United States and its outlying possessions of parents one of whom is an alien, and the other a citizen of the United States who, prior to the birth of such person, was physically present in the United States or its outlying possessions for a period or periods totaling not less than five years, at least two of which were after attaining the age of fourteen years.
Two years, not five. After age 14, not 16. Even if he wasn't born in Hawaii, Obama is a natural born U.S. citizen under the Constitution and the laws of the United States.