[libstripper]

The problem is, as I stated, that he was apparently born in Hawaii while Hawaii was a state, something that appears to trump everything else and make him a natural born citizen under the same SCOTUS precedent that makes children of illegal aliens who are merely born in the U.S. natural born U.S. citizens. The way this rule is written, it appears to apply to children of U.S. citizens who are born outside of the U.S. Again, my question is, "How do we challenge his eligibility to run for POTUS, given the act that he was apparently born in the U.S.?"

[ClearCase_guy]

The problem is, as I stated, that he was apparently born in Hawaii ...

If that's true, then there is no problem and all this tin-foil stuff is a waste of effort.

But, without access the his birth certificate, that KEY ASSUMPTION that he truly was born in Hawaii is not proven. If that piece turns out wrong, then the tin-foil stuff may have validity.

This topic doesn't truly go away until we see the birth certificate.