Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: roaddog727

We don’t need a technology driver like the OICW, and we also shouldn’t settle for some re-warmed old potatoes in a new package. What we need at this point is something feasible that brings a real advantage to the table, and nothing so far proposed fits that description.

Think: first mini-ball, semi auto, first breech loader........

What we need is something that “significantly” enhances either the capabilities or performance of the weapon. The goal isn’t to make a fashion statement, change things just for the sake of changing, or to make some guys feel special by adopting a toy for them. We don’t need any more Army black-beret nonsense, and essentially that’s what a lot of this is.


37 posted on 05/21/2008 6:12:36 PM PDT by Red6 (Come and take it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]


To: Red6

“We don’t need any more Army black-beret nonsense, and essentially that’s what a lot of this is.”

Until you fire the weapon, you have nothing further to add, other than uninformed opinion.


39 posted on 05/21/2008 6:25:19 PM PDT by roaddog727 (BS does not get bridges built - the funk you see is the funk you do)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson