Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 05/12/2008 2:04:11 AM PDT by Swordmaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Alamo-Girl; albee; AnalogReigns; AnAmericanMother; Angelas; AniGrrl; annyokie; Aquinasfan; ...
Dr. John Jackson's new hypothesis PING!

If you want on or off the Shroud of Turin Ping List, Freepmail me.


2 posted on 05/12/2008 2:05:37 AM PDT by Swordmaker (Remember, the proper pronunciation of IE is "AAAAIIIIIEEEEEEE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Swordmaker

Jesus Christ, the Son of God, rose from the dead, what’s the problem?


4 posted on 05/12/2008 3:22:40 AM PDT by rusureitflies? (OSAMA BIN LADEN IS DEAD! There, I said it. Prove me wrong.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Swordmaker

Nonsense. The area from which they took the sample for radiocarbon dating WAS in a rewoven section.....and it’s quite obvious when viewed microscopically.

This whole “it was created in the Middle Ages” junk has been shot down completely.


5 posted on 05/12/2008 3:59:35 AM PDT by RightOnline
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Swordmaker
I have been "following" the Shroud since the 1960's =

There has/will be a veracious antipathy of certain entities against the Shroud...they will froth at the mouth rather than ever acknowledge that the Shroud may just be authentic. Thus is has ever been, the struggle of the Light and the Dark.

I have kept track of Barrie Schwortz's most excellent site at http://www.shroud.com/ and have corresponded with him over the years. (Barrie, a scientist on the 1978 'expedition', went into it as a skeptic)

As a portrait artist, I approach the problem from the evidence that exists in paintings - most particularly the iconic renderings that have existed from long before the carbon-dating postulations.

The iconic paintings of Jesus had one original source and there were many hundreds painted for the churches (no photography back then) = they all have the same visage - and is the depiction still used today as what we recognize as Jesus: with the hair, the beard, etc..

This is one of my favorite icons = and, as you can see by going to the web site - it is interchangeable with the shroud. (Another thing that pins it for me is that many of the iconic paintings have a wisp of hair mid-forehead...This 'wisp' shows on the Shroud - it is, actually, flows of blood = but was thought by the early painters to be hair. It is little things like this that, in my mind, connect the Shroud with the early iconic paintings.

http://www.shroudofturin4journalists.com/pantocrator.htm

This famous iconic painting, the "Pantocrator" - was painted in the 500's = centuries older than the carbon dating = The artist obviously, in my mind, took this image from the Shroud.

But there are some that will never accept the authenticity of the Shroud - even were Jesus to appear before them and so identified it. There will always be wheat and there will always be chaff...

7 posted on 05/12/2008 9:34:38 AM PDT by maine-iac7 (Typical Gun-Toting, Jesus-Loving Gramma)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson