Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

THE REAL REASON CONGRESS IS DEMANDING AMERICA CONVERT TELEVISONS FROM ANALOG TO DIGITAL???
08 March 2008 | Robert Drobot

Posted on 03/08/2008 4:59:24 AM PST by Robert Drobot

I've read one argument coming from Congress that holds this change will be a boon for employment and manufacturing. However, inasmuch as things electrical are not manufactured in our country this needed production can only benefit our not-so-good friends in China.

There is a further argument that it is necessary for some yet to be explained national security purpose.

I've come across the minutes of one Congressional staff meeting ( H.R.___, Regarding the Transition to Digital Television in which 'security' is referenced forty-six ( 38 ) times; 'national security' is referenced three ( 3 ) times; and Homeland Security is referenced five (5 ) times.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Conspiracy
KEYWORDS: analog; china
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081 next last
To: purpleraine

an improvement


41 posted on 03/08/2008 5:35:42 AM PST by purpleraine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: DB
Then why mandate change? If digital is better why not open the digital channels without getting rid of the analog?

I am not against the change. I am sure digital is better.

Why doesn't Congress mandate that everyone use at least DSL and get rid of dial-up?

42 posted on 03/08/2008 5:36:54 AM PST by raybbr (You think it's bad now - wait till the anchor babies start to vote!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: tet68

“Obviously, the tin foil lobby is behind this so they can sell lots of tin foil hats

Ya’ll just don’t make the connection, digital signals defeat aluminium foil....go through it like butter right
to the brain stem, say hello to your new alien overlords.”

Well I for one would like to extend a welcome to our new alien overlords. ;)


43 posted on 03/08/2008 5:43:57 AM PST by GoDuke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy
But what about the tinfoil people use to fix their indoor analog antennae? Is the tinfoil lobby working at cross-purposes?

Well, very true, but it's takes a lot more tinfoil to cover up your windows to stop the over the air digital signal sent to your converter box you got from the government for free.

44 posted on 03/08/2008 5:44:16 AM PST by Popman (Gold Standard: Trying to squeeze a 50 lb economy back into a 5 lb bag)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Robert Drobot
"...in the insanity of a free trade market ( quicksand ) economy.

As opposed to the sanity of a fully protectionist model.

45 posted on 03/08/2008 5:45:03 AM PST by Sam's Army
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: raybbr
I have standard expanded cable. I have noticed my cable co says things will continue to operate normally (for analog TVs).

They do, however, in the fine print, indicate that the current feeds will continue to work for the next 2 years.

I have a feeling that, in a couple of years, even the cable companies will be mandating that customers switch from analog feeds to digital feeds, and even cable companies will drop analog in the near future.
46 posted on 03/08/2008 5:46:09 AM PST by TomGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: purpleraine
A very persuasive point of view. Thank you.
47 posted on 03/08/2008 5:46:31 AM PST by Robert Drobot (Da mihi virtutem contra hostes tuos.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: John W
The only way I can get the digital local channels is through the satellite box. They charge an extra $10 a month for what was free.
48 posted on 03/08/2008 5:46:33 AM PST by Beagle8U (FreeRepublic -- One stop shopping ....... Its the Conservative Super WalMart for news .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Robert Drobot

I tried in my younger days to be a full-fledged libertarian, but I kept thinking of things the government does pretty well. Interstate system for one. I can’t conceive of a radio-tv system broadcasting without centralized technical regulations. Maybe the internet will change that.


49 posted on 03/08/2008 5:48:38 AM PST by purpleraine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: raybbr

All of that spectrum has been allocated for many years. There was no place to add new digital channels without overlapping what is already there.

The spectrum isn’t free for other uses until the current users are gone.

It is a huge waste of space and progress to leave the spectrum allocated for TV channels that are mostly absent to continue on. At some point you have to make the change. The change is now.


50 posted on 03/08/2008 5:50:51 AM PST by DB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: TomGuy
"I have a feeling that, in a couple of years, even the cable companies will be mandating that customers switch from analog feeds to digital feeds, and even cable companies will drop analog in the near future."

I believe the commentary coming from the Congressional sub-committee minutes I posted above ( ( H.R.___, Regarding the Transition to Digital Television ) say this very thing.

51 posted on 03/08/2008 5:54:55 AM PST by Robert Drobot (Da mihi virtutem contra hostes tuos.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Sam's Army
"As opposed to the sanity of a fully protectionist model."

Tell that to those laid-off home-foreclosure victims of 'free' trade. Nothing is 'free' and the swelling rolls of unemployed skilled and middle management American Citizens can sadly attest to that grim fact.

52 posted on 03/08/2008 6:01:09 AM PST by Robert Drobot (Da mihi virtutem contra hostes tuos.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Robert Drobot

That’s a new one: my opposition to tariffs resulted in the sub-prime mortgage fiasco. I will ponder it some more.


53 posted on 03/08/2008 6:02:40 AM PST by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Robert Drobot
We are told by the government it is in our national interest to live in the insanity of a free trade market ( quicksand ) economy. Why then is the Congress sticking its ugly head into the alleged 'free marketplace' tent; making law to cram a digital signal down the collective throats of Americans, when we didn't ask for this dictatorial intervention???

Its easier to put the subliminal messages in a digital broadcast. This is important because with the advent of bottled water, people weren't getting the doses of fluoride that they were before.

54 posted on 03/08/2008 6:03:41 AM PST by SampleMan (We are a free and industrious people, socialist nannies do not become us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: John W
And, with sub-channels, three times the programming.

Pardon my ignorance, but what are these sub-channels? Are these channels in addition to the main network channel? Is the programming different on these sub-channels? Thanks.

55 posted on 03/08/2008 6:07:49 AM PST by rawhide
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Robert Drobot
"Tell that to those laid-off home-foreclosure victims of 'free' trade."

Free trade = foreclosure. Got it.

"the swelling rolls of unemployed skilled and middle management American Citizens can sadly attest to that grim fact."

Unemploymernt is DOWN almost half a percent in the last 3 months. Did the MSM not tell you that? I'm shocked!

http://research.stlousifed.org/fred2/data/UNRATE.txt

56 posted on 03/08/2008 6:18:39 AM PST by Sam's Army
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: rawhide

Well, I’m not the expert, but, for example in our area of Northeast Indiana we are near Fort Wayne. One of the channels is 33, an NBC affiliate. Their digital signal enables them to broadcast more than one station. So, either through your satellite box or your digital TV you receive, in their case, the regular station on 33-1, My TV on 33-2 and NBC Weather Plus including local cut-ins on 33-3. Some use their subs for a 24-hour radar which is nice.


57 posted on 03/08/2008 6:30:31 AM PST by John W
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: live+let_live
"I love conspiracies, they’re lots of fun. But this is just the evolution of the technology. Digital is better. It uses narrower frequencies than analog."

Does narrow frequencies mean more channels? Surely there is some real reason for this beyond boosting WalMart and the Chinese, et al.

Since when does Congress have anything to do with progress?

58 posted on 03/08/2008 6:50:33 AM PST by HangThemHigh (Entropy's not what it used to be.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: DB

Ever heard of multiplexing?


59 posted on 03/08/2008 7:15:45 AM PST by Cvengr (Fear sees the problem emotion never solves. Faith sees & accepts the solution, problem solved.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: SlowBoat407

At first I bought the limited resource argument, until I began to think about how signals are presently utilized in communication theory.

I’m open to review the mathematical arguments, but I haven’t yet seen the proof that it isn’t possible to have both analog and digital available. IMHO, it’s simply a matter of convoluting the signals so that an appropriate demodulator/codex is employed to deconvolute the source to reproduce the appropriate source signal.


60 posted on 03/08/2008 7:22:07 AM PST by Cvengr (Fear sees the problem emotion never solves. Faith sees & accepts the solution, problem solved.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson