Texas and Ohio freepers should vote for Hillary

self | 2-13-08 | Engine82

[Engine82]

No doubt Hillary is the weakest candidate on the democrat side. Assuming Texas and Ohio have open primaries and the GOP nomination has been clinched by McCain republican voters in Ohio and Texas should ask for a democrat ballot and mark Hillary's name.

Sending the two liberal democrats into a convention without a clear nominee is good for Republicans.

If you have a friend who lives in Ohio and Texas send them an email asking them to muddy the waters for the democrats by voting for Hillary.

[Man50D]

That strategy couldn't be more illogical if you are a Conservative. It would be a waste a of a vote for a Conservative to focus on the Socialist Democrats instead of working for a brokered convention in the GOP to nominate a Conservative.

Your idea also makes the false assumption McCain will be the nominee. That is far from a forgone conclusion. The goal is not so much focused on having Huckabee win but to prevent McCain from acquiring enough delegates to get the nomination. Voting for Huckabee or any of the other candidates will achieve that goal and consequently force a brokered convention in order to nominate a Conservative.

[jveritas]

If Obama gets in he will be a weak President, if Hillary Clinton gets in she will take your guns, your money and your freedom, she is an evil vindictive person, and like Obama she will surrender in the war on terror because she wants to keep her polls up as her husband did.

[Hacklehead]

“I can’t pull the primary lever for McCain or Huckabee, and none of the others have a snowball’s chance in a Texas summer, so I’m voting the DEM ballot in the TX primary.

I’m leaning Obama.

He’s a goofy, incompetent, inexperienced socialist who will cause damage if he wins. But I think his damage can be modulated by the GOP opposition (hope there’s some still standing!)

On the other hand Hillary Clinton is PURE EVIL. And that’s saying nothing about that prancing jackass Bill having the run of the WH for four years — I don’t think my cardiovascular system could handle that. IMO she needs to be terminated (politically) ASAP, with extreme (political) prejudice.

I’m not about to play that asinine “who could McVain beat more easily” game. For one thing, it’s unknowable. I’m just going to focus on what I can contribute to put Hillary away (politically).”

Absolutely brilliant. Someone gets it! When it comes to the KKKlintons, its best to nuke them from orbit. Its the only way to be sure. Instead we have (expletive deleted) arguing that we should save them.

[Azzurri]

I have to disagree. I believe Obama would be much easier to beat in a general election. Hillary can hold the Kerry vote and there will be a block of women who will vote for her just because she’s a woman. Obama will lose a LOT of Hispanics to someone like McCain, and will lose a significant number of conservative and moderate Democrats because of his race.

Blacks 13% of the electorate
Women 53% of the electorate

It’s simple math. Plus, he’s an empty suit who has not been defined yet. He’s got to defend the most liberal record in the Senate. No candidate with as liberal a past record has won the White House since...since...well, never.

[Azzurri]

I have to disagree. I believe Obama would be much easier to beat in a general election. Hillary can hold the Kerry vote and there will be a block of women who will vote for her just because she’s a woman. Obama will lose a LOT of Hispanics to someone like McCain, and will lose a significant number of conservative and moderate Democrats because of his race.

Blacks 13% of the electorate
Women 53% of the electorate

It’s simple math. Plus, he’s an empty suit who has not been defined yet. He’s got to defend the most liberal record in the Senate. No candidate with as liberal a past record has won the White House since...since...well, never.

[Senator Goldwater]

I believe that this is really stupid.

---

Exactly. Bury the witch.

Obama won’t win a single red state against McCain.

[lookout88]

I don’t think so. She wouldn’t want to be the defeated president. Obama will do it.

[lookout88]

I don’t think so. She wouldn’t want to be the defeated president. Obama will do it.

[incindiary]

You obviously underestimate the evil of the Clintons. I have researched them for years (I had an anti-Clinton website) and you don't get any more criminal and traitorous than the Clintons. Once again, we have NOT seen the worst of them, by helping them to get the nomination, you would be making a HUGE mistake. If she's the nominee, she WILL beat McCain, and become the next president. Even if it means illegally, somehow, it will happen.

As far as your comment that Hillary would be better than Obama as President... Politically-speaking, they are both socialists, but as far as I know, Obama does not have a long history of criminal activity that the Clintons do, he does not have a list of dead bodies, he does not have something like Waco under his belt, or other serious crimes, he seems to be more like a not-so-smart puppet, rather than a smart but pure evil demon like the Clintons.

Besides, as someone else said, how can you stand before God and admit that you voted for someone as evil as Hillary, just to play a political game? I don't know how anyone could do that.

[CzarNicky]

This is exactly what I plan on doing.

[top 2 toe red]

Totally disagree! Vote for Obama!

If there is any way in the world we can help get her out now, we must do it!

They are the most ruthless and evil people America has ever had to deal with, NOTHING will stop her if she gets the nomination.

Cheating will have never been seen before compared to what will go on if she is on the ticket.

Vote Obama!

[Emmett McCarthy]

Hell, I’ll throw in both my ex-wives!

[ScreamingFist]

LOL, the proxy server error has us all posting twice.......

[JayNorth]

Hillary is probably look for a way to cut Obama off at the knees.

Obama better have a good food taster and his own, trusted aircraft mechanic. I wouldn't put Arkancide past the two Clintons if Obama is too big a threat.

[top 2 toe red]

So do I ... They had better be careful of what they wish for!

[Nervous Tick]

>> The point isn’t to make Hillary the nominee, it’s to set up the Dems for a civil war at the convention.

There is merit in the approach of voting for the underdog. However, I think Obama IS the underdog, despite what the DinoMedia are trumpeting. So voting for Obama is a twofer!

>> With that said, I don’t know if the strategy is worth it or not.

(sigh) I agree FRiend... but it’s about the only primary arrow I have in my nearly-empty quiver.

[Soliton]

I believe that this is really stupid.

It is perhaps the stupidest idea in the history of politics. It is the intellectual equivalent of the Penguin tying up Batman and waiting 12 hours for hime to figure out how to beat the sharks with lasers on their heads. Batman always escapes because the bad guy doesn't finish him when he can. Finish off Hillary (politically) as soon as possible. I would rather have an actual Obama presidency than a potential Clinton one.

[Pikachu_Dad]

It’s not tempting. SHE MUST BE PUT AWAY NOW.

[jmj3jude]

No, she will have to put Obama on the ticket, it will be demanded of her. When she tries to steal the race from Obama, he will get the second prize. It will be the only way to quell the outcry, so the Clinton's think. And I still think even that won’t work. I hope the Obama supporters stand up to the Clinton's and fight. Obama has the wind at his back, he has all the excitement, the Clinton's will need him. They think the way to salvage the nomination is for Obama to be the vice prez, But will he go along with their ruse?

[top 2 toe red]

On the other hand Hillary Clinton is PURE EVIL. And that’s saying nothing about that prancing jackass Bill having the run of the WH for four years — I don’t think my cardiovascular system could handle that. IMO she needs to be terminated (politically) ASAP, with extreme (political) prejudice.

Ditto to what you said! No, make that a double ditto!!