Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 01/24/2008 9:39:27 AM PST by charles m
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: charles m

Fahrakahn’s not gonna be happy.


2 posted on 01/24/2008 9:40:28 AM PST by weegee (Those who surrender personal liberty to lower global temperatures will receive neither.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: charles m

racists


3 posted on 01/24/2008 9:54:27 AM PST by americanophile
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: charles m
The Achilles' heel of the orient-origin theory is that human fossil records do not exist on the mainland from 50,000 to 100,000 years ago.

Actually, the problem is in the DNA evidence of a spread from Africa -- basically, no "unexplainable" introductions of non-African lines. Other accounts of this find talk about a "low" forehead and pronounced brow ridges. The "orthodox" Chinese position is that modern humans came from China. This seems to be a fix so that the find fits the "theory".

4 posted on 01/24/2008 9:59:45 AM PST by JimSEA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: charles m
Presuming the early news on the China find is correct, the time frame now reads:

180kya South Africa
130kya Ethiopia
110kya Israel
100kya China
60kya Australia
50kya Europe

Clearly a coastal species that eventually followed rivers inland much later.

5 posted on 01/24/2008 10:08:51 AM PST by shuckmaster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: charles m
PhotobucketPhotobucket
9 posted on 01/24/2008 11:13:09 AM PST by Dick Vomer (liberals suck....... but it depends on what your definition of the word "suck" is.,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: charles m

The default Chinese position is that the yellow race is so obviously superior that it couldn’t have anything in common with the “lesser races” on the other continents. I expect Chinese “scientists” to continue asserting conclusions that cannot be corroborated by scientists around the world. In fact, I suspect they won’t let foreign scientists have unrestricted access to their “evidence”. What Chinese “scientists” are doing is secular religion (asserting yellow superiority), not science.


10 posted on 01/24/2008 11:16:26 AM PST by Zhang Fei
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: charles m

100,000-year-old human skull found
China Daily | Wednesday, January 23, 2008 | unattributed
Posted on 01/23/2008 2:48:22 PM EST by SunkenCiv
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/1958356/posts
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/1958356/posts?page=24#24


17 posted on 01/24/2008 11:52:49 AM PST by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/__________________Profile updated Wednesday, January 16, 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam

· join list or digest · view topics · view or post blog · bookmark · post a topic ·

 
Gods
Graves
Glyphs
Just adding to the catalog, not sending a general distribution.

To all -- please ping me to other topics which are appropriate for the GGG list.
GGG managers are Blam, StayAt HomeMother, and Ernest_at_the_Beach
 

· Google · Archaeologica · ArchaeoBlog · Archaeology magazine · Biblical Archaeology Society ·
· Mirabilis · Texas AM Anthropology News · Yahoo Anthro & Archaeo ·
· History or Science & Nature Podcasts · Excerpt, or Link only? · cgk's list of ping lists ·


18 posted on 01/24/2008 11:53:50 AM PST by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/__________________Profile updated Wednesday, January 16, 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

sidebar:
The Neandertal Enigma
by James Shreeve
Frayer's own reading of the record reveals a number of overlooked traits that clearly and specifically link the Neandertals to the Cro-Magnons. One such trait is the shape of the opening of the nerve canal in the lower jaw, a spot where dentists often give a pain-blocking injection. In many Neandertal, the upper portion of the opening is covered by a broad bony ridge, a curious feature also carried by a significant number of Cro-Magnons. But none of the alleged 'ancestors of us all' fossils from Africa have it, and it is extremely rare in modern people outside Europe." [pp 126-127]

19 posted on 01/24/2008 11:54:55 AM PST by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/__________________Profile updated Wednesday, January 16, 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: charles m
Ancient skull dug up in Henan may bury 'Out of Africa' theory

The theory takes it on the Chin?

Certainly gives a different slant to it at any rate.

22 posted on 01/24/2008 12:19:26 PM PST by N. Theknow (Kennedys: Can't drive, can't fly, can't ski, can't skipper a boat; but they know what's best for us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: charles m
"It's just been discovered," said Liu Wu , director at the Institute of Vertebrate Palaeontology and Palaeoanthropology. "We guess it could lead to some important evidence. But so far it is mostly a guess."

Wu Who? True, Liu. Anything beyond a guess would be a bonehead move if the Scientific Method is applied, by definition.
26 posted on 05/10/2008 10:33:42 AM PDT by The Spirit Of Allegiance (Public Employees: Honor Your Oaths! Defend the Constitution from Enemies--Foreign and Domestic!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson