To: Badeye
The main question to ask is why this tiger was not put down a year ago when it nearly tore the arm off a zoo keeper?
5 posted on
12/27/2007 6:44:43 AM PST by
7thson
(I've got a seat at the big conference table! I'm gonna paint my logo on it!)
To: 7thson
Depends on the specifics. I’ve heard the Zoo keeper violated SOP when the incident occured.
6 posted on
12/27/2007 6:46:20 AM PST by
Badeye
(The two “no” votes were cast by Ron Paul and leftwing nut Dennis Kucinich.)
To: 7thson
The main question to ask is why this tiger was not put down a year ago when it nearly tore the arm off a zoo keeper? Because it's a TIGER! What do we expect a toger to do, roll over and do tricks? They are master killers and carnivores.
To: 7thson
What's at work here is a judgment by humans that the tiger was not at fault ~ rather, the keeper made a mistake and precipitated the event.
That particular judgment is totally devoid of what the event meant to the cat and how it affected her.
Now we know that she discovered that the humans come apart just like a joint of goat, and we see where that route takes her!
23 posted on
12/27/2007 6:57:46 AM PST by
muawiyah
To: 7thson
From the article regarding the arm incident: "The tiger was acting like a normal tiger".
So....
Besides, a tiger probably cost a pretty penny.
To: 7thson
"The main question to ask is why this tiger was not put down a year ago when it nearly tore the arm off a zoo keeper?"
You'd pretty much have to put down every big cat, wolf, bear, et cetera if you were do adopt that stance. Most zoo animals are dangerous, which is why we keep them segregated from the public.
31 posted on
12/27/2007 7:06:21 AM PST by
LIConFem
(Thompson. Lifetime ACU Rating: 86 -- Hunter Lifetime ACU Rating: 92 (any combo will do, fellas))
To: 7thson
“The main question to ask is why this tiger was not put down a year ago when it nearly tore the arm off a zoo keeper?”
Because its a wild animal doing what wild animals do.
To: 7thson
why this tiger was not put down a year ago when it nearly tore the arm off a zoo keeper?Siberian tigers are an endangered species. That might have violated the Endangered Species Act.
98 posted on
12/27/2007 9:01:21 AM PST by
reg45
To: 7thson
106 posted on
12/27/2007 9:17:53 AM PST by
jwatz49
To: 7thson
There's so much friggin' money in these endangered critters that you don't put them down easily. I believe I read that this particular cat was for "breeding". (That's where the money is).Wonder if the cat was on any meds?? Who knows? The rest of the world is.
Blame "man" first...and the money will keep flowing. Start thinking twice about holding these critters in cages and the money flow stops.
I simply don't believe in Zoos.
220 posted on
12/29/2007 10:01:18 AM PST by
Sacajaweau
("The Cracker" will be renamed "The Crapper")
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson