[blueplum]

i agree.

I may be just a pea-brain, but i don’t understand how howie can ask anyone for information at this point, when jurisdiction hasn’t been settled, or why anything pertaining to thompson, bain, etc. would be of interest to him. is this a silent suit on their behalf or what?

is the insistence on the Dec 5 date relative to the Dec 10th resumation of the inquest, i wonder?

[blueplum]

is ‘resumation’ even a word? lol

*resumption

[Sacajaweau]

When O'Quinn was deposed by Howard and his attorney's, they tried again and again to get names of witnesses out of O'Q.

Howard's attorney was constantly reminded of "Attorney-Client privilege" and told in layman's terms, (IMOW), "Go to hell".

[Sacajaweau]

Oh my...what a sentence girl!

Is insisting on the December 5th date relative to resuming the inquest on December 10th?

Everything is relative my dear Watson!!

[Vice - Investigator]

is the insistence on the Dec 5 date relative to the Dec 10th resumation of the inquest, i wonder?

3,878 posted on 12/05/2007 12:42:18 AM PST by blueplum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3876 | View Replies ]

BINGO! hence the motion to quash.. :-)