Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: nature
Why would Perker base his conclusions on the words of persons who are or should be considered suspects in a death? Something rotten here.
3,295 posted on 11/15/2007 12:11:31 PM PST by Jane Austen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3284 | View Replies ]


To: Jane Austen

Perper was overwrought with KE’s beauty. Then like in NCIS, a Mark Harmon “wanna be” smacked him on the side of the head....and you know the rest!! :-)


3,299 posted on 11/15/2007 12:33:47 PM PST by Sacajaweau ("The Cracker" will be renamed "The Crapper")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3295 | View Replies ]

To: Jane Austen

at the time, the focus was not on a ‘suspicious’ death, but an accidental death. Moe and Taz clouded the issue by not telling the whole truth to begin with.

Perper didn’t believe the suicidal story - we know it was talked about because he debunked the subject at length in his report, pretty much listing out things he had been told (by KE or HKS or both) and reasons he wasn’t buying it.

curiouser to me, was LB’s testimony that Anna was on ‘suicide watch’ when he claims she was supposedly being ‘detoxed’


3,333 posted on 11/16/2007 3:05:40 AM PST by blueplum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3295 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson