http://factweb.net/HoustonDailySummaries.html
It's all about Anna Nicole and the early litigation so maybe you have to punch in something else??
I think the whole Marshall suit will be thrown out as FRAUD...and HKS knows it....and THAT'S why he's asking for 6% of "everything".
IT would be interesting to go back to her diaries after reading this....You'll be able to pick out the lies. Diaries aren't necessarily truthful.
Thanks for that site. Wow, she sure was mean to Marshall and lied up a storm. I don’t think there will be any Marshall money either. She wants half of his fortune for only 14 months of marriage. She probably wasn’t even with him half of that time and when she was she was mean to him. He sure made a mistake by marrying her and look at the misery she has put the Marshall family through. She didn’t count on someone named Howard K. Stern being more manipulative and heartless than she was. I believe in karma. I’m going back to read somemore...Thanks again. Everyone should read this.
***Stern transmitted the document to California where Bankruptcy Magistrate Samuel L. Bufford reportedly posted the protected document on his website to be viewed by the general public for a period. This incident and others by both Stern and Bufford continue to raise mysteriously unanswered questions about collusion between Anna Nicole’s attorneys and the Bankruptcy court in the California case.**
FROM YOUR POST
http://factweb.net/HoustonDailySummaries.html
Sac, I read the lengthy account of the Houston trial that you posted tonight. It paints a picture of a ruthless grifter with big dreams, a larger than life personality and beauty, a kind heart toward some and little impulse control or commitment to the truth.
I agree with Doris that everyone should read at least some of this account of the legal battle between Pierce Marshall and ANS. I vaguely remember at the time that she seemed ignorant and a bit conniving. And concluding that Pierce Marshall probably wasn’t such a nice man. It’s clear from this account that Pierce Marshall was totally innocent, but simply stood between ANS and his father’s millions.
And that is what is so disturbing. ANS was capable of creating chaos and pain in people’s lives just to get what she wanted. And she met her mirror image in HKS, only he possessed the self-restraint she lacked. In the end, whatever she did to that old man and his children, HKS gave it back to her, only more deadly. I’m not saying she got what she deserved. Just that she is solely responsible for her fate, I guess as we all are.
Daniel is the real victim in this story. I’m not sure if his death was murder, suicide or accidental. I hope we find out someday. There are only two clear bits of evidence that point to murder: the private detective’s testimony, if true; and what he said to Ray Martino, “don’t leave me there”, if true. With all the lies told, the obfuscation, the missing pieces of information, will we ever know the answer? Will Howard get away with it all? I’m not sure I care what happens to him anymore. I think he is already getting the punishment he deserves, namely having to live with himself.
thanks very much for finding that!
from your cite:
Dec 19th, ‘01 - “Howard Junior stuck a knife through the heart of Vickie Lynn Marshall’s (stage name Anna Nicole Smith) case today when he told jurors that his father’s MPI stock “came out of his father’s first marriage and was his father’s separate property.” A surprised defense attorney Rusty Hardin drove the point home for the jury adding, “As of June 26, 1994 everything your father owned was his separate property as it applied to anyone he married on June 27, 1994?”
“...Vickie’s attorneys don’t want jurors to hear about the fact that Howard Senior’s MPI stock was his separate property because that means Vickie >>isn’t entitled to inherit it << since it was not part of the community property in their marriage.
“Attorneys for defendant Pierce Marshall contend that the MPI stock...was his separate property dating back to the time of his divorce from his first wife in the 1960s and was never community property during his marriage to Vickie. >>That takes a huge amount of money off the table since MPI stock made up the majority of Howard Senior’s wealth. “<<
again, using your cite: [wonder what happened to CV?]
Feb 12th, ‘01 - “Vickie received shares in a corporation set up in her name as well as the $6.6 million...
Feb 19th, ‘01 - “Attorney Jeff Townsend provided billing records to show that he met with a number of attorneys regarding a company Howard Senior set up to benefit Vickie.
“Vickie denied being aware of the company’s existence and denied knowing some of the attorneys who said they represented her in the negotiations. The company was designed to promote Vickie’s career and was funded with millions of dollars by her late husband.
“Vickie, however, never agreed to go along with the arrangement that was designed to provide for her long term economic support.
Feb 21st, ‘01 - “Scurlock told jurors Vickie was not telling the truth when she testified she had never heard of Compaignie Victoire, a corporation Howard Senior created to provide long term support for Vickie. Vickie told jurors she never refused to come to Marshall’s office. Scurlock said she constantly declined to come to meetings involving Compaignie Victoire. Jurors have heard that Howard Senior planned to use Compaignie Victoire as a way to provide long term security for Vickie, but Vickie did not seem to understand the concept of the corporation and would not sign the agreement.
more from your cite:
Jan 30th, ‘01 - “Attorney Rusty Hardin pressed Vickie on how she lost $4 million in jewelry.
“She admitted being drunk and waking up to find the jewelry missing. Her bodyguard, a convicted felon, told police he had the jewelry, but >>it was never recovered<<.
Feb 12th, ‘01 - “Within a few days of her husband’s death, Vickie told the court that her debts included a $350,000 lien on the California home Howard Senior purchased for her in cash. Vickie said she owned >>nine lawyers or law firms<< another $350,000. What about the millions of dollars of jewelry Vickie received? “I don’t have my jewelry, my jewelry is all gone,” Vickie told the jury. The 1995 affidavit offered this explanation as to why she doesn’t have it anymore:
“Although it is commonly known that my husband gave me a large amount of jewelry that cost him several million dollars, all of this jewelry has been stolen from me >>over the past 18 months,<< I suspect by relatives, former bodyguards, former friends, and my son’s former nanny...”
Feb 13th, ‘01 - “Jurors saw dozens of canceled checks >>made out to cash<< for tens of thousands of dollars...Vickie told the jury she had >>at least four other people << who were allowed to sign her checks and >>didn’t always know what the money was being used for<<<... “my assistants pay my bills. I didn’t do anything with them, I had people taking care of me.” At one point Vickie told the court that she found an old check from a talent agency for $27,000 stuck in her fan mail.
Feb 01, ‘01 -= Smith >>appeared especially shaken when she was shown an affidavit with her signature<< that was used to make a $450,000 “home improvement loan” on the house J. Howard Marshall purchased for her in California. Her signature attested that she bought and maintained the house with her own money. Smith has testified J. Howard bought and paid to maintain the home. Smith then continued her pattern of outrageous statements by >>implying that Hardin fabricated the affidavit<<.
“Do you understand what perjury is?” asked Hardin, pointing out that >>Smith’s own attorneys had provided the document<< she was questioning.
Feb 13th, ‘01 - Tuesday - “Vickie told her lawyer, “I just want to go home. I don’t belong here, I just want to go home.”
Thanks for this post!