again, using your cite: [wonder what happened to CV?]
Feb 12th, ‘01 - “Vickie received shares in a corporation set up in her name as well as the $6.6 million...
Feb 19th, ‘01 - “Attorney Jeff Townsend provided billing records to show that he met with a number of attorneys regarding a company Howard Senior set up to benefit Vickie.
“Vickie denied being aware of the company’s existence and denied knowing some of the attorneys who said they represented her in the negotiations. The company was designed to promote Vickie’s career and was funded with millions of dollars by her late husband.
“Vickie, however, never agreed to go along with the arrangement that was designed to provide for her long term economic support.
Feb 21st, ‘01 - “Scurlock told jurors Vickie was not telling the truth when she testified she had never heard of Compaignie Victoire, a corporation Howard Senior created to provide long term support for Vickie. Vickie told jurors she never refused to come to Marshall’s office. Scurlock said she constantly declined to come to meetings involving Compaignie Victoire. Jurors have heard that Howard Senior planned to use Compaignie Victoire as a way to provide long term security for Vickie, but Vickie did not seem to understand the concept of the corporation and would not sign the agreement.
Would this have wrecked "her fraudulent bankruptcy case?"
Would this have prevented her from going after "the whole ball of wax"?
Would her shares go to Marshall's son upon her death?
She didn't all of a sudden get brilliant and not sign...It had to be HOWARD who told her not to sign.