Posted on 10/13/2007 6:14:00 PM PDT by fatima
Anna Nicole Smith, Seeking Justice #4
Mary J. Blige, Timbaland, 50 Cent, Wyclef Jean and Tyler Perry have been named in relation with a steroids trafficking case in Albany, NY that has already landed athletes like Barry Bonds and Marion Jones in hot water.
Information has surfaced recently showing those stars are among tens of thousands of people who may have used or received prescribed shipments of steroids and injectable human growth hormone in recent years. Law enforcement officials have said they have no evidence in their sprawling multistate probe that customers, including Blige or other entertainers, violated any laws. Instead, they are targeting anti-aging clinics, doctors and pharmacists who prescribed the drugs.
-snip-
http://ahotmessblog.com/?p=1988
Howard had to keep Billy from her no matter what.
It might have meant contacting Virgie though, too. That couldn't happen either. And the "I hate mommy video" was about to be born!
It pertains to the $88 million but it seems like Howard interjects that it is for the Marshall Estate..The judge froze the $88 million...and no payment has been made.
The marriage "advice" and "marital privilege" gets mentioned in here.
Also threats against Crosby source: Vicoderniam (sp).
There is mention of Howard at the counsel table IN TEXAS where the judge clipped his wings and sent him to the back of the room!!
The deposition was adjourned pending a call by a judge as to whether Howard has to produce documents. I believe he WILL have to produce some of them...partcularly the 6% document. Howard is a lousy witness. No wonder he's not a trial lawyer.
As far as I know, documents may be filed in more than one place because I've seen it occur.
I was taught: Filed documents are "evidence" not "proof".
Before I open that pdf, do you know if pages 1-30 are there?
Or 39-68, 70-72, 82-90, 93-114, and a bunch more I made notes on that were missing from the first posting of it? I have a copy, but with all those holes in it.
Thanks.
talking about retainers made me think of the estate - i recall reading that “Anna’s mortgage” remaining on the Studio City house was $1.3m less $700K, and that is why her assets were only about $10K (less property taxes overdue), so we were told by Ron Rale
but wait a minute - if the [way-below] ownership transfer is correct, and recognizing that corporations are entirely separate stand-alone entities, then it isn’t Anna personally that owes any remaining mortgage on the house, nor should Anna personally have made $700K in payments - Hot Smoochie Lips, a calif. corporation, owed the mortgage, and the payments should have been made in that corporate entity name out of the income of the corporation. Any mortgage still due at time of sale, should also be the responsibility [debt]of the corporation.
In addition, Anna would have had to have sold the home to the corporation for ‘due consideration’ [’gifting’ it would be highly unusual but would still require a paper trail]. Was the purchase agreement filed with the Franchise Tax Board? Was the original financing refinanced in Hot Smoochie lips name?
if there was some sort of off-the-wall agreement that in the event of the death of one partner in the corporation, the remaining partner assumed all ownership, then that would logically also include all the existing debts of the company as well as all the assets of the company. This agreement would have to be documented by the corporation.
If the corporation was subsequently sold in 2007, as appears, then there should be some sort of escrow for sale, as well as purchase agreement, in which all the assets and all the debts are line-itemed. This also would become part of the corporate records and would have to be documented.
If Rale/Stern are claiming in estate proceedings that only a single partner/corporate officer [Anna] was liable for debts of the corporation, {the mortgage remaining balance] and yet proceeds of the sale in mar 2007 (?date) went entirely to the remaining partner/corporate officer [Howard dearest] then it seems fuzzy math in play by charging the remaining balance on the mortgage against Anna’s personal estate
On 4/11/2005, the house of Anna Nicole Smith, located at 3646 Avenida Del sol, Studio City, CA 91604, was purchased by Vickie Lynn Marshall for $1,335,000. On 4/11/2005 the Grantee is in the name of Vickie Lynn Marshall. One day later, on 4/12/2005, the Grantee was changed to: Hot Smoochie Lips Inc.
three puzzle pieces connected - probable cause?:
**1. Aug ‘06 - Daniel meets with Harding - allegedly expresses fear of HKS, allegedly expresses desire to hire Harding; money is discussed “He told me that Stern had given orders to the staff that any time that he would call to hang up on him,” Harding said of Daniel. “And the boy was frightened to death of Stern, according to what he told me.” [source: CNN, Nancy Grace]
**2. Aug 22 ‘06 - email from Anna to third party: “My son hates me, I can’t even talk to him right now, I have too much stress as it is, but it kills me, my heart is broken”.
[therefore, sometime on or about Aug 22, Anna and Daniel had a fight (over the phone)(phone records?) - so bad that Anna used the word, ‘hate’ - could it have been over Daniel wanting money to hire Harding? expressing his feelings about Stern? Was any of the topic of the ‘hate’ discussed further in the email quoted? Did Anna tell Stern about Daniel ‘hate’ reason?]
[Aug 25 ‘06 - methadone shipment from Kapoor]
**3. Sep 7-8? ‘06 - (phone record?)
Anna Nicole recalls the conversation she had with Daniel following the birth of Dannielynn and remembers how excited he was.
“I called him and I told him that I just had his baby sister and he was so, so excited.
When I told him, he was like, ‘I have a baby sister?’ And I said, ‘Yes, pumpkin, you have a baby sister.’ And he said, ‘Really momma? Can I drive her around? Can I hold her?’ And I said, ‘Yes, pumpkin, you can.’ I gave the phone to Howard and they got the tickets and everything.”
http://www.theinsideronline.com/news/2006/11/8988/index.html
Sep 9 ‘06 - “Don’t leave me down there,” Daniel said.
“I won’t,” Ray promised.
Daniel boarded the plane.
Page 36, Blonde Ambition, Rita Cosby
When did Anna AND HOWARD make the tape about fighting with Danny? (When was it aired?)
The Tape: Howard was sitting in a chair by Anna's side, rubbing her arm.
She turned to Howard and said "He was having trouble with a girlfriend, right?....and Anna turned back to the camera and said "right, he was having trouble with a girlfriend".
Who did she email on Aug 22nd? When did Cosby get that info? Hmmm...Thompson provided it?
I THINK...Putting an asset into a corporation in this case is a way of separating it from your other assets, keeping it from being subject to liens against any estate.
But there's usually State taxes involved in a corporation and something had to be filed with the IRS at some point.
I'm not sure of the importance of the whole thing EXCEPT that Larry and Dannielynn are living (hiding) there....right next door to KE...one of the monsters of this bizarre scenario.
Thanks! I’ll take a look at it then.
One of the comments made a good point. Larry might be the genetics attached to the eye problem. She/he commented...His eyes look a little wonky. I think she’s correct. Wonky eyes and air between ears!
btt
I clicked your link last night - it didn’t come up. But, I lost my Start button.
I was thinking about that, after I posted about wondering if there had been strabismus on Anna’s side of the family - could be that Larry already *knew* where it came from.
Now, if that precious baby starts talking out of one side of her mouth, we’ll know where that came from, too, lol. I saw posters somewhere saying they heard her say “Anna” on ET - I missed that. Just heard “da da da”.
I’m sure ET will be lying in wait for her first real “words,” too. Gotta save that for another payday. Tossup - will it be “Anna” “Momma” or “Daddy”?
OK, finished reading it. Aarrggh. Wanted to wring both their necks, lol (Leroy and Howie).
Well, I dare them to prove there was ever a law firm named “Stern, Rale & Khavarian” or any variation thereof. I have never been able to find it and I have looked six ways to Sunday.
As I said once before, the closest I ever came was finding business address listings for the three at the same address on Bedford, but in different years - never at the same time.
Sounds to me like they were trying to rip Anna off to begin with.
Yikes, Howie didn’t consider that living in TX for 5 months and “providing counsel” to Anna during that time was “work.” Hahahhahahahahahhahaha!
And that cock & bull about HKS not being the one who took Pierce’s financial statement off the table to fax to Judge Buford (or whatever the BK judge’s name was) is total BS. Who else would’ve or could’ve done that?
I still say he sold that valuable info to some financial media person somewhere or to an investment company. Everybody had been wanting for years to know some way to value Koch stock, which is a tightly guarded secret by the private company.
Oh, also, about the “paid bloggers” questions in the depo .. I wish these guys would get it straight.
People who own “blogs” (weblogs) and post their own thoughts and articles and news items are not the same as “posters” who post comments on those blogs or on forums and message boards.
I am not a “blogger” - and most of us here aren’t, either. Ha, Howard knows that, too - thus the parsing of the terminology - and how he has never employed bloggers on his behalf. Nope, just posters!
He apparently has adopted Leroy’s disdain of Internet posters, too. He allows as how he “has far better things to do” than read forums, lol. *Such as?*
Leroy once called all of us who do this something like “pathetic people with no lives.” Of course, he had read every single word on at least a few of the crime forums where some of us posted!
Which is worse, people talking over the ‘Net or people who just read all of it?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.