Posted on 09/08/2007 9:31:03 PM PDT by nickcarraway
LONDON - The bard, or not the bard, that is the question.
Some of Britain's most distinguished Shakespearean actors have reopened the debate over whether William Shakespeare, a 16th century commoner raised in an illiterate household in Stratford-upon-Avon, wrote the plays that bear his name.
Acclaimed actor Derek Jacobi and Mark Rylance, the former artistic director of Shakespeare's Globe Theater in London, unveiled a "Declaration of Reasonable Doubt" on the authorship of Shakespeare's work Saturday, following the final matinee of "I am Shakespeare," a play investigating the bard's identity, in Chichester, southern England.
A small academic industry has developed around the effort to prove that Shakespeare, a provincial lad, could not have written the much-loved plays, with their expertise on law, ancient and modern history and mathematics.
The "real" author has been identified by various writers in the past as Christopher Marlowe, Francis Bacon, or the Earl of Oxford, Edward de Vere.
"I subscribe to the group theory. I don't think anybody could do it on their own," Jacobi said. "I think the leading light was probably de Vere, as I agree that an author writes about his own experiences, his own life and personalities."
The declaration put forward by the Shakespeare Authorship Coalition — signed online by nearly 300 people — aims to provoke new research into who was responsible for the plays, sonnets and poems attributed to the writer.
Jacobi and Rylance presented a copy of the document to William Leahy, head of English at Brunel University in west London and head of the first graduate program in Shakespeare Authorship Studies, which begins this month.
The document says there are no records that any William Shakespeare received payment or secured patronage for writing. And it adds that although documents exist for Shakespeare, all are nonliterary.
It also points to his detailed will, in which Shakespeare famously left his wife "my second best bed with the furniture," as containing no clearly Shakespearean turn of phrase and mentioning no books, plays or poems.
The declaration names 20 prominent doubters of the past, including Mark Twain, Orson Welles, Sir John Gielgud and Charlie Chaplin.
It argues there are few connections between Shakespeare's life and his alleged works, but they do show a strong familiarity with the lives of the upper classes and a confident grasp of obscure details from places like Italy.
"It's a legitimate question, it has a mystery at its center and intellectual discussion will bring us closer to that center," Leahy said. "That's not to say we will answer anything, that's not the point. 'It is, of course, to question.'"
Fixed it.
So it was your decision to go electric?
not one for too much research, I take it ;o)
LOL - good one
LOL
Actually - the whole ball of wax in a nutshell, to mix metaphors
I'll say one thing, the royalty checks started getting a lot bigger after that. And Bobby enjoyed performing a lot more once the smelly hippies and Commies stopped going to his concerts.
The plays were not written by Shakespeare, but by another man of the same name.
Sez who????
I’m not that interested in “exposing” Shakespeare, just parodying him.
We know that he was an actor. Just as some actors try to be writers today, why wouldn't ith ve happened then?
I’m reminded of one of my English professors talking about “Timon of Athens.” She said, “It’s terrible hakespeare. it would be great for you and me, but it’s terrible Shakespeare.”
The burden of genius.
Mark Twain is quoted as saying: "The works of Shakespeare were either written by Shakespeare or by another man of the same name."
Even if there's truth in the theories, it's the sort of think a lot of people don't want to get involved in because of all the cranks.
Sadly, after a century of speculation, thes theories, like the origins of the Federal Reserve and a few other topics I couldn mention, have become the preserve of kooks.
I actually wrote a parody of Shakespeare’s “Julius Caesar” whihc I am trying to get produced. If you can help, FReepmail me your email address and I’ll send it to you.
That Bacon could have been Shakespeare is thoroughly impossible. We have so much of Bacon’s writing to compare with Shakespeare’s. No writer could completely change their style, especially over that much writing.
I’ve always told people that my favorite English playwright was Edward Devere, the Earl of Oxford. Only 5% of the folks I have mentioned this to understand what I am saying.
He didn’t write ‘em; but after he died, his friends spent their own money to publish his works—under his name—so they wouldn’t be lost.
?
You really think that poncey, spoiled diletante could have written any of Shakespeare’s plays? Read the poems known to be his, and you will change your mind.
FreeRepublic now has the same subject matter as the Moist Board. HAHAHAHAHA !
Well, this is scary. I actually understood that.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.