Posted on 08/29/2007 5:18:09 PM PDT by wagglebee
Semi-GGG Ping.
That’s part of what I meant. Titanic’s sinking resulted in some very valuable design and safety lessons.
Yes, more than often these disasters are what improves designs avoiding future disasters.
Tacoma Narrows Bridge being one of the most obvious.
If a valuable piece of equipment is inaccessible while at sea the Captain or anyone of rank can order any necessary steps to recover it for use up to and including cutting torches.
The locks of that era were easily breached and no doubt at least one member of the crew could have done it on command.
The whole line of reasoning sounds like something from a Monty Python sketch.
"Oh dear, we've locked the binoculars away, what shall we do?"
Best regards,
pimp my key bump
I don’t disagree at all.
Well said!
Including the lesson that the screws were too close together, probably too shallow and the rudder wasn't big enough.
Part of what doomed the Titanic was its sheer size, which was much bigger than any ship before the Olympic class. They didn't have experience operating such a behemoth. This was shown in an earlier collision when the ship, or perhaps it's sister, caused another ship in port to swing out toward it by the force of its movement in the water. Though as I recall Smith had captained an earlier ship that hit an iceberg he just didn't appreciate the danger. Indeed that earlier accident may have given him a false sense of security that he would come out of any iceberg encounter okay. Though some unaccounted for ships were probably lost this way over the years, without radio or even wireless no one was around to witness it. No one stopped to think how long it was going to take to swerve around an obstacle, or that the rudder was too small to work efficiently, or that throwing the engines in reverse would delay the effects of the rudder and cause a turbulence that worked against it. They would have been better to stop engines and ram right into it, bow first.
On the other hand, the conditions that night added to the circumstances that doomed Titanic. It was believed to be a black berg, and on a calm and moonless night it was very difficult to see. Not even the telltale white caps striking the berg at the waterline were there.
I am trying to remember the speculation about this factor is one of the books I read. I think it came down on the side of the advantages of binoculars, mostly as a barrier from the icy wet air that would have stung the lookouts' eyes more than any magnification. In any event, it's incredible there was only a single key, or really that they even locked them up at all.
I am thinking I remember that the crew thought the binoculars had been left in port. Maybe that was a story invented to shield this guy Blair. Anyway, there was some cannibalizing of Titanic for its sister Olympic after the collision caused repairs to be needed and parts were taken off Titanic at the yards and used for Olympic. Anyway, the bottom line is the crew didn’t realize how important they would turn out to be.
Please FREEPMAIL me if you want on or off the
"Gods, Graves, Glyphs" PING list or GGG weekly digest
-- Archaeology/Anthropology/Ancient Cultures/Artifacts/Antiquities, etc.
Gods, Graves, Glyphs (alpha order)
removed Mr Blair and drafted in Henry Wilde, a senior officer from sister ship, the Olympic, because of his experience of such large liners.Not quite enough, apparently.
I seem to remember reading about the crews nest crew having binoculars during the trip. I don’t beleive this sstory, also why come out now? why not before?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.