Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 05/21/2007 9:33:17 PM PDT by LoserPays3000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: LoserPays3000

HOOAH!!!!!


2 posted on 05/21/2007 9:48:56 PM PDT by LiteKeeper (Beware the secularization of America; the Islamization of Eurabia)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LoserPays3000

Bump for later reading.


3 posted on 05/21/2007 10:02:18 PM PDT by TBP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LoserPays3000

Bump for later reading.


4 posted on 05/21/2007 10:03:31 PM PDT by TBP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LoserPays3000

Yawn. The Miracle of Evolution is just that, a Miracle. One set into motion by God..


5 posted on 05/21/2007 10:06:48 PM PDT by cardinal4
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LoserPays3000

THANKS TONS.

REF PING


6 posted on 05/21/2007 10:54:59 PM PDT by Quix (GOD ALONE IS GOD; WORTHY; PAID THE PRICE; IS COMING AGAIN; KNOWS ALL; IS LOVING; IS ALTOGETHER GOOD)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LoserPays3000
As a general rule, anyone who claims that mathematics can be used to prove or disprove the theory of evolution is a loon with no understanding of either math or biology.

From looking at the website, I can't see why anyone would pay to read what are a bunch of old creationist canards easily available from any one of dozen of apologetic sites scattered across the internet, and just as easily disproven by anyone not blinded by their particular scriptural exegesis.
7 posted on 05/21/2007 11:10:12 PM PDT by DiogenesTheDog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LoserPays3000
Sutcliff's style is like Ann Coulter's...

His style is like Coulter's? You mean loaded with anti-science propaganda and poorly researched tertiary references dealing with a subject on which the author has no clue? Sorry to hear that.


...and the book backs up the brazen title with over 40 sources and rock-solid research.

Forty sources means nothing when you are using biased anti-science sources, as I suspect is the case if the website is any guide.

Rock-solid research? Ignore this silly book and try some real sources, such as those listed below:

American Journal of Human Biology
American Journal of Human Genetics
American Journal of Physical Anthropology
The Anatomical Record Part A
Annals of Human Biology
Annals of Human Genetics
Annual Review of Genomics and Human Genetics
Anthropological Science
Anthropologie
L' Anthropologie
Archaeometry
Behavior Genetics
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology
Biological Psychology
Biology and Philosophy
BMC Evolutionary Biology
Current Anthropology
Current Biology
Economics and Human Biology
Ethnic and Racial Studies
European Journal of Human Genetics
Evolution and Human Behavior
Evolutionary Anthropology
Forensic Science International
Gene
Genetical Research
Genetics
Genome Research
Heredity
Homo
Human Biology
Human Heredity
Human Genetics
Human Genomics
Human Molecular Genetics
Human Mutation
International Journal of Osteoarchaeology
Journal of Anthropological Archaeology
Journal of Archaeological Science
Journal of Biosocial Science
Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies
Journal of Human Evolution
Journal of Human Genetics
Journal of Molecular Evolution
Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute
Molecular Biology and Evolution
Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution
Nature
Nature Genetics
Nature Reviews Genetics
PLoS Biology
PLoS Genetics
Proceedings of The Royal Society: Biological Sciences
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Russian Journal of Genetics
Science
Trends in Genetics

8 posted on 05/22/2007 7:28:26 AM PDT by Coyoteman (Religious belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LoserPays3000
It's also non-technical

Possibly significant.

25 posted on 05/25/2007 3:32:47 PM PDT by RightWhale (Repeal the Treaty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Image and video hosting by TinyPic

31 posted on 05/26/2007 8:47:49 AM PDT by SunkenCiv (Time heals all wounds, particularly when they're not yours. Profile updated May 22, 2007.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LoserPays3000
>Sutcliff's style is like Ann Coulter's...

How does he look in
a slinky black dress? Because
that's Ann's only plus...

44 posted on 07/17/2007 2:34:28 PM PDT by theFIRMbss
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LoserPays3000

The ‘why’ question is either scientific or implies intent and purpose. Evolution certainly has a purpose and meets a need in science, not primarily biological science but human science.


56 posted on 07/31/2007 8:09:18 AM PDT by RightWhale (It's Brecht's donkey, not mine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson