His style is like Coulter's? You mean loaded with anti-science propaganda and poorly researched tertiary references dealing with a subject on which the author has no clue? Sorry to hear that.
...and the book backs up the brazen title with over 40 sources and rock-solid research.
Forty sources means nothing when you are using biased anti-science sources, as I suspect is the case if the website is any guide.
Rock-solid research? Ignore this silly book and try some real sources, such as those listed below:
American Journal of Human Biology
American Journal of Human Genetics
American Journal of Physical Anthropology
The Anatomical Record Part A
Annals of Human Biology
Annals of Human Genetics
Annual Review of Genomics and Human Genetics
Anthropological Science
Anthropologie
L' Anthropologie
Archaeometry
Behavior Genetics
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology
Biological Psychology
Biology and Philosophy
BMC Evolutionary Biology
Current Anthropology
Current Biology
Economics and Human Biology
Ethnic and Racial Studies
European Journal of Human Genetics
Evolution and Human Behavior
Evolutionary Anthropology
Forensic Science International
Gene
Genetical Research
Genetics
Genome Research
Heredity
Homo
Human Biology
Human Heredity
Human Genetics
Human Genomics
Human Molecular Genetics
Human Mutation
International Journal of Osteoarchaeology
Journal of Anthropological Archaeology
Journal of Archaeological Science
Journal of Biosocial Science
Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies
Journal of Human Evolution
Journal of Human Genetics
Journal of Molecular Evolution
Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute
Molecular Biology and Evolution
Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution
Nature
Nature Genetics
Nature Reviews Genetics
PLoS Biology
PLoS Genetics
Proceedings of The Royal Society: Biological Sciences
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Russian Journal of Genetics
Science
Trends in Genetics
Where does the website ever mention anything to do with creation? It does not and neither does the book. Aside from a belief in God, the author does not get into the issue of faith. However, he does expose the fraud and the bias of so-called scientists who are desperate to replace God with man.
What ‘creationist canards?’
Anti-science sources? You mean like James Watson who wrote DNA, Biophysicist Lee Spetner who wrote Not by Chance and Biochemist Michael Behe who wrote Darwin’s Black Box? Sutcliff cites countless examples of mathematicians, biologists, chemists and physicists who have discarded evolution and called it for the nonsense that it is.