Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Coyoteman

What ‘creationist canards?’


15 posted on 05/24/2007 11:53:35 AM PDT by LoserPays3000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: LoserPays3000
What ‘creationist canards?’

My comment was:

His style is like Coulter's? You mean loaded with anti-science propaganda and poorly researched tertiary references dealing with a subject on which the author has no clue? Sorry to hear that.

For a good discussion of Coulter's "anti-science propaganda and poorly researched tertiary references" try the following:

Ann Coulter: Clueless.

I think after reading that, most folks will agree that when it comes to evolutionary sciences, Coulter has no clue.

18 posted on 05/24/2007 12:33:57 PM PDT by Coyoteman (Religious belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: LoserPays3000

The PC evoliberals obviously have never taken a statistics course. The odds of the bogus things happening in evolution are astronomically remote.


55 posted on 07/31/2007 8:07:11 AM PDT by LH8993 (evolution, phony science, global warming, coulter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson