What ‘creationist canards?’
My comment was:
His style is like Coulter's? You mean loaded with anti-science propaganda and poorly researched tertiary references dealing with a subject on which the author has no clue? Sorry to hear that.For a good discussion of Coulter's "anti-science propaganda and poorly researched tertiary references" try the following:
I think after reading that, most folks will agree that when it comes to evolutionary sciences, Coulter has no clue.
The PC evoliberals obviously have never taken a statistics course. The odds of the bogus things happening in evolution are astronomically remote.