Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Caption this bitter, pro-choice leftist and read her rant against the SCOTUS
Flickr Photos ^ | 4/19/07 | peskymac

Posted on 04/19/2007 11:06:38 AM PDT by redstates4ever

"I'm incredibly bitter today. And disgusted. What the Supreme Court did today is nothing short of repugnant. I can't say that I'm exactly surprised that a group of conservative men chose to expand federal powers and sanction torture for women today by declaring the ban on late term abortions that President Bush signed in 1993 does not violate the Constitution.

No, not surprised that people who will never have any idea of what it means to be forced to choose between your own life or that of the fetus you're carrying would make such an emotional and irrational decision. None of these men will ever be forced to carry a fetus against their will. This decision will never impact them at all - all their wives, daughters, and mistresses are well off enough that they can fly to a more humane country if something unforeseen and awful happens during their pregnancies. It's the normal, every day women who will suffer. And what do they care? They got to make their point.

Does my life mean so little? Do the Supreme Court justices really think they have such vast medical expertise and personal knowledge of my health and personal life that they - not my doctor and not me - should be making my medical decisions? I realize that at the time the Constitution was written, women didn't really have any rights - but do they really think putting my health on the level of livestock is really the way to go?

Less than 2% of abortions occur after 21 weeks. Women do not run around getting knocked up willy nilly for the sheer pleasure of having invasive and painful surgeries, and they especially do not look forward to have to make a choice between getting chemo for cancer or sacrificing their lives for a healthy baby. Most men that I know do not want to face fatherhood alone - they do not want children enough to let their wives die for it. They do not look forward to the idea of letting the kid visit mommy in the graveyard.

It kills me - kills me - that pro-forced childbirth advocates are so happy about this! Do they think they've just saved countless lives? Do they honestly and truly think that this decision will stop late term abortions from happening? I know, I know, they don't give a rat's ass about the reality of the situation - just their f**ked up, rose-colored glasses worldview. "

(my edit on the swear word in the last sentence)


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: captionarama; prolife
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 201-209 next last
To: redstates4ever

I have still never heard of *any* medical condition that would require a late-term abortion. An emergency C-section or early induced labor resulting in a live birth would presumably meet the same need.


61 posted on 04/19/2007 11:27:05 AM PDT by A_perfect_lady
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle
>>It kills me - kills me - that pro-forced childbirth advocates are so happy about this!<<

It’s not about killing you, you ugly selfish b#tch. You got your life and now just murder the lives that YOU deem unnecessary.

62 posted on 04/19/2007 11:28:08 AM PDT by ishabibble (ALL AMERICAN INFIDEL)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: redstates4ever

“I’m going to put the world out of my misery and use this hanger for a lobotomy.”


63 posted on 04/19/2007 11:28:49 AM PDT by IndySecurityMom (Nicely Painted Toes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Scotswife
Well, Rosie doesn’t think that fire can melt steel. Apparently she has never been to Pittsburgh or watched “Terminator 2”...
64 posted on 04/19/2007 11:29:59 AM PDT by WV Mountain Mama (God, please wrap Your arms around each of the victims. Grant them strength and comfort. Amen)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

Wasn’t Clintton in the oval office in 93? Unless George H.W. Bush signed the ban before January 20th or so...

Deluded and angry, thiw woman is... (/Yoda speak)


65 posted on 04/19/2007 11:30:16 AM PDT by MortMan (Good health is merely the slowest possible rate at which one can die.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: redstates4ever

These people are incapable of accepting any limitation on abortions. It’s that simple. And they will continue to rant and rave and get their way, unless somebody stands up to them.


66 posted on 04/19/2007 11:32:45 AM PDT by popdonnelly (Our first responsibility is to keep the power of the Presidency out of the hands of the Clintons.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: redstates4ever

The picture says a lot more about abortionists and their supporters than it says about Right to Life conservatives or USSC justices.

Apparently, if abortions are banned, then abortionists will immediately forget all of their technologically advanced abortion methods and crush/burn all of their medical equipment and instruments in favor of coat hangers.

Yessir, those abortionists care so much for the life and health of their patients, that instantaneously they will willingly abandon all safety and technology in order to use coat hangers instead.

Exudes confidence, don’t it?


67 posted on 04/19/2007 11:32:59 AM PDT by savedbygrace (SECURE THE BORDERS FIRST (I'M YELLING ON PURPOSE))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Scotswife

I know your question was rhetorical but ... they stab the baby in the head and suck out its brains because their real goal isn’t saving the mother’s life, their real goal is a DEAD baby.

Those live babies are just SO inconvenient, you know. They cry and expect someone to feed them, change them - maybe even hold them once in awhile.


68 posted on 04/19/2007 11:33:19 AM PDT by Let's Roll (As usual, following a shooting spree, libs want to take guns away from those who DIDN'T do it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: MortMan

Yes, he surely was............LOL.

Bush didn’t take office until January 21st, of 2001.

Dumb liberals.

This is how CNN reported it:


CNN.com - Bush signs ban on late-term abortion - Nov. 6, 2003

And buried in the article:

“WASHINGTON (AP) — President Bush signed legislation Wednesday banning a certain type of abortion, handing the disputed procedure’s opponents a long-sought victory even as a federal judge at least partially blocked the new law from taking effect. “

They’re all liars.


69 posted on 04/19/2007 11:34:02 AM PDT by Howlin (Honk if you like Fred Thompson!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: redstates4ever
"What's the difference between Charlten Heston and me? Charlten Heston has to register his lethal weapon. I don't."
70 posted on 04/19/2007 11:34:18 AM PDT by Bryan24 (When in doubt, move to the right....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: redstates4ever

71 posted on 04/19/2007 11:34:53 AM PDT by reagan_fanatic (I have a big carbon footprint and I'm not afraid to use it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: redstates4ever
ARMED AND DANGEROUS
72 posted on 04/19/2007 11:35:06 AM PDT by Bryan24 (When in doubt, move to the right....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: redstates4ever

Not for nothing, but isn’t this person a bit long in the tooth to be so concerned? She looks to be well into her forties.


73 posted on 04/19/2007 11:36:04 AM PDT by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: redstates4ever

"If the State won't kill, I'll kill it myself"

74 posted on 04/19/2007 11:36:14 AM PDT by Bryan24 (When in doubt, move to the right....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: redstates4ever
I wonder how many abortions that skank has had? Probably more than one.......

Murder is always better than birth control. < / sarcasm >

75 posted on 04/19/2007 11:36:30 AM PDT by NRA2BFree (DUNCAN HUNTER FOR PRESIDENT IN 2008! HE IS A TRUE CONSERVATIVE!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MissEdie

I don’t need to see her unattractive face to know what an ugly human being she is inside.


76 posted on 04/19/2007 11:36:50 AM PDT by rottndog (Fred Thompson will mop the floor with all the other Republican nominees.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: redstates4ever

She is wearing a wedding ring. It appears someone married her.

Now I feel bad.


77 posted on 04/19/2007 11:39:08 AM PDT by Tenacious 1 (No to nitwit jesters with a predisposition of self importance and unqualified political opinions!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bryan24

A Mother's Love

A Mother's Hate

78 posted on 04/19/2007 11:40:27 AM PDT by Bryan24 (When in doubt, move to the right....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: redstates4ever

Another beautiful feminist; both inside and out.


79 posted on 04/19/2007 11:40:41 AM PDT by AD from SpringBay (We have the government we allow and deserve.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NeoCaveman
1993? To think Bush did all that before he was even governor of Texas...

Haven't you learned by now? It's ALWAYS Bush's fault!

80 posted on 04/19/2007 11:45:30 AM PDT by twhitak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 201-209 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson