Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Sacajaweau

What do you mean? I don’t see a connection.

BTW: The Docket shows a response to JQ’s response is DUE BY JULY 31


14,169 posted on 07/20/2007 7:28:32 AM PDT by nature (somewhere over the rainbow)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14167 | View Replies ]


To: All

07/17/2007 19 ALTERNATIVE MOTION to Transfer Cause of Action based on the Doctrine of Forum Non Conveniens as codified by Congress in 28 USC 1404(a) and 28 USC 1406(a) by John O’Quinn. Responses due by 7/31/2007 [See Image at DE #17](ls) (Entered: 07/18/2007)

#17 btw is JQ’s filing


14,171 posted on 07/20/2007 7:51:38 AM PDT by nature (somewhere over the rainbow)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14169 | View Replies ]

To: nature
It looks like the "implant" case involves an investigation both of the expenses O'Quinn charged and holding funds in his account...similar to Opri/Larry suit not Stern/O'Quinn.

Really have no idea what the court and/or Howard will do with regard to the Stern/O'Quinn suit....but at least we have another target date and Howard will be kept scrambling.

We still are in the dark regarding the custody bit in the Bahamas. Haven't the slightest idea what the end game in that is supposed to be. Maybe?? Larry is the natural father with all rights with Howard as next in line?? Just don't know what Howard and Larry have in mind.

14,172 posted on 07/20/2007 8:09:58 AM PDT by Sacajaweau ("The Cracker" will be renamed "The Crapper")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14169 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson