Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

This thread has been locked, it will not receive new replies.
Locked on 10/13/2007 6:39:17 PM PDT by Admin Moderator, reason:

New thread: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/1910919/posts?page=1



Skip to comments.

Anna Nicole Smith, The Investigation #3

Posted on 04/07/2007 3:14:35 PM PDT by mom4kittys

Thread Number 3


TOPICS: Chit/Chat
KEYWORDS: aboutthebaby; anna; annanicole; ans; deadwrongdaddy; getalife; giveitup; hksisafillintheblank; howietheleach; ilovelarry; killingmesoftly; larryisawesome; larryisthedaddy; larrysalunatic; lazyboylarry; lovechild; movealong; nojusticenopeace; oneheroinevirgie; overbonbonsdeadbody; prayersfordannielynn; ritaisaliar; ritaisnotaliar; shameonlarry; spermdonorsanonymous; sternsaresquatters; teambirkhead; thefatladywarmingup; thefirm; turkeybasterd; virgieisevil; virgieisnotevil
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 6,501-6,5206,521-6,5406,541-6,560 ... 17,421-17,435 next last
To: TexKat

Well, they got a few things wrong in the story, but I’m glad to hear some snippets from Brunstad and Richland on the status.

” ... After Marshall’s August 1990 death, ...”

He died in August 1995.

” ... A U.S. district court in Los Angeles later took over the case and cut the award to $88 million, plus $42 million in punitive damages. ...”

No, they awarded a total of $88 million, $42 million of which was in punitive damages. And it was thrown out, which led to the SCOTUS appeal.

” ... What happens next in the inheritance battle ...”

It’s not an inheritance battle, which is the whole point. It was a claim against what ANS’s team termed a trust she claimed she was promised while JHMII was still alive, but she wasn’t. It was not contesting the will, which has already been probated and closed.


6,521 posted on 04/19/2007 7:16:39 PM PDT by Rte66
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6513 | View Replies]

To: TexKat

It’s the top lip that’s the “problem.” It seems to be smeared all over her face.


6,522 posted on 04/19/2007 7:19:01 PM PDT by Rte66
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6519 | View Replies]

To: TrishaSC

That’s her? She was so pretty before she did all that to her mouth.


6,523 posted on 04/19/2007 7:21:44 PM PDT by mom4kittys (If velvet could sing, it would sound like Josh Groban)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6520 | View Replies]

To: mom4kittys

I’ll give her props. I remember her on Day of our Lives and she and Halle Berry made the short hair cut popular. I could never look good with short hair and very few women can pull it off and look good. I think she’s pretty but the lips are too darn big and unnatural looking.


6,524 posted on 04/19/2007 7:26:46 PM PDT by TrishaSC (Still Team Birkhead)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6523 | View Replies]

To: mom4kittys

mom4kitty, you have a large ping list! Results of a great recruiter to this thread.


6,525 posted on 04/19/2007 7:31:20 PM PDT by tennmountainman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6380 | View Replies]

To: Luvlyness

OOOOPS typo...He was hoping SHE would forget the details!!

Yeppers it’s kind of hard to remember details when you are dead.


6,526 posted on 04/19/2007 7:33:39 PM PDT by tennmountainman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6361 | View Replies]

To: tennmountainman

I had LOTS of help! We’ve got a good group here.


6,527 posted on 04/19/2007 7:36:33 PM PDT by mom4kittys (If velvet could sing, it would sound like Josh Groban)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6525 | View Replies]

To: PeskyOne

I have a feeling that the key people who kept Anna f*cked up, and diverted her funds, nevermind lived off her, will skate. It doesn’t matter whether there was intent to kill two people for gain, or if it was a colosal blunder. These drugs were perscribed illegally.

If you or I went that far, even half that far, we’d be pushing some serious jail time. The Marshall would have knocked on Horizon’s front door giving an eviction notice, and a half hour to gather our things. I’ve seen it, and it isn’t pretty.

As Larry is Dannielynn’s father, and I see no compelling reason why he can’t be, he should have been off that damn island last week. All these motions are smelling to high heaven.

I also want Virgie to have generous visitation rights, as well as Larry’s family. Dannielynn needs structure and normal family relations....far away from Hollywood. Larry might want to think about returning to college and getting a degree that would allow him to live a normal life.


6,528 posted on 04/19/2007 7:45:20 PM PDT by TheSpottedOwl (Head Caterer for the FIRM)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6319 | View Replies]

To: Rte66

~LOL~ He did, didn’t he!


6,529 posted on 04/19/2007 7:50:00 PM PDT by Arizona Carolyn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6517 | View Replies]

To: TrishaSC

Her mouth was much prettier before.... I haven’t seen many upper lips plumped that look good — unless the person doesn’t have much lip at all..


6,530 posted on 04/19/2007 7:51:05 PM PDT by Arizona Carolyn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6520 | View Replies]

To: Rte66

IMO the Jury screwed up... her body language this trial spoke volumns.... no way should she be getting such a light sentence.


6,531 posted on 04/19/2007 7:56:45 PM PDT by Arizona Carolyn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6515 | View Replies]

To: mom4kittys

Lisa Rinna’s lips were big ‘naturally’ and looked OK, if a bit lush....BUT she obviously jumped on the ‘collagen bandwagon’ and plumped them up EVEN MORE! What resulted is exactly what we see in that picture! It’s ridiculous, bc most actresses and starlets started out wanting their lips to look the way Lisa Rinna’s looked naturally!! But, as usual, the Hollyweird crowd goes SO overboard that even the person (attribute) they are trying to emulate gets OVER-done! I guess Lisa saw everyone ‘plumping’ their lips (to look like hers did naturally!!) and figured she needed it TOO! I’m so glad I live UNIVERSES away from HollyWeird...the inhabitants are soooooo INSECURE!! LOL!!!


6,532 posted on 04/19/2007 8:17:26 PM PDT by kcw2007
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6496 | View Replies]

To: hedda lettis

“Furthermore, I am totally pixxed at the Seminole LE for not releasing the phone records. Really, really, really!!! That alone would set a lot of suspicions to rest, or confirm them.”

I don’t get it. I thought that the phone records, of the cell phones of HKS and KE would be the property of the company - Sprint, Verizon, whatever, regardless of where the cell phone customer was located when the calls were made. I think while the SPD doesn’t have to release the hotel phone records or whatever records they subpoenated, the original records are still owned by the parent cell company. I THINK?

Wouldn’t anyone outside the SPD still be able to get a court order for copies of those same records? I just don’t see how the original records can be passed over as unobtainable on the basis that they are “owned” by the SPD. It would seem the SPD can only own their COPIES of the original cell phone records. Am I missing some legal point?

Sorry if this has already been clarified elsewhere.


6,533 posted on 04/19/2007 8:34:08 PM PDT by nynjanais
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6406 | View Replies]

To: kcw2007

Gotta have that “pouty” look doncha know?


6,534 posted on 04/19/2007 8:37:36 PM PDT by mom4kittys (If velvet could sing, it would sound like Josh Groban)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6532 | View Replies]

To: nynjanais

The only thing I can think of is that the phones records may be “private” until they become part of a police report—then they would be part of a “public” record. I think the Seminole PD operates differently from a regular police department because of it being tribal.


6,535 posted on 04/19/2007 8:41:16 PM PDT by mom4kittys (If velvet could sing, it would sound like Josh Groban)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6533 | View Replies]

To: nynjanais

I can shed some light on the cell phone records policies of the major cell phone companies. I deal with their subpoena departments all of the time either with signed releases from customers or actual subpoenas.

Cell phone companies are VERY sensitive to subscriber privacy and those records belong to the consumer. If you have a legit signed court order or subpoena you can get records.

Had a Florida Police Agency or State Attorney gotten those records they could have been viewed after the case was closed with the Sunshine Law. However, as has been pointed out...

The Seminole Tribe doesn’t have to give anything to anybody and they are not going to. They want this to all go away and the sooner the better in their opinion.


6,536 posted on 04/19/2007 8:57:48 PM PDT by msgumshoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6533 | View Replies]

To: Bronwynn

Excellent!!


6,537 posted on 04/19/2007 9:00:55 PM PDT by lakey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6458 | View Replies]

To: msgumshoe

It really does make me wonder if they ever *were* subpoenaed. I bet not.


6,538 posted on 04/19/2007 9:01:31 PM PDT by Rte66
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6536 | View Replies]

To: mom4kittys

“The only thing I can think of is that the phones records may be “private” until they become part of a police report—then they would be part of a “public” record. I think the Seminole PD operates differently from a regular police department because of it being tribal.”

Well, maybe, but I can’t see how the ownership of the records generated on machinery and satellite capabilities owned by a company NOT located within the SPD jurisdictionI ie within the US) can be now claimed to be the sole property of the nation of the Seminoles. It THAT what is claimed? Maybe, but I’m no lawyer and I’m just speculating.

I keep wondering if someone hasn’t “cut a deal” with HKS to not go after subpoenaeing the records of the US based cell phone company in a US court of law? Even so, surely the records of calls received by KE, — who was NOT in the Seminole jurisdiction after leaving ANS, or any other stateside potential HKS “insider,” eg Bonbon , should be obtainable.


6,539 posted on 04/19/2007 9:14:43 PM PDT by nynjanais
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6535 | View Replies]

To: nynjanais

They have to have (or have *had* at the time) probable cause, just like any search warrant.

If they don’t believe a crime has been committed, which they say they don’t, then there is no probable cause for the subpoena.


6,540 posted on 04/19/2007 9:21:57 PM PDT by Rte66
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6539 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 6,501-6,5206,521-6,5406,541-6,560 ... 17,421-17,435 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson