| This thread has been locked, it will not receive new replies. |
|
Locked on 10/13/2007 6:39:17 PM PDT by Admin Moderator, reason:
New thread: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/1910919/posts?page=1 |
Posted on 04/07/2007 3:14:35 PM PDT by mom4kittys
Thread Number 3
Heaven’s no- I was sure Howard knew much more about the drugs than he wanted to let on. He was just doing what lawyer’s do and made it plain he didn’t want the bench trial to delve into Anna’s drug use.
Re: the moral relativism thing- I haven’t been able to make myself clear. My fault. I’m not justifiying any behavior.I’ve said wrong was done. Now, both Anna and Howard were guilty of moral relativism which allowed them to act in some of the ways they did. I’m tired- can’t post straight.
Is is just me or does it seem like Barrett is a “biggie,” in the Bahamas. It looks like he’s everywhere.
Seriously, it looks like Doc Barrett’s doing EVERYTHING - selling seminars to insurance companies, treating patients as an ex addict, consulting with the police force, part of the National Drug Commission, running camps for addicted teens and adults, AIDS commission.... Oh and consulting with Dr. KE on ANS. Plus sometimes he’s a psychologist but other times he’s a psychiatrist. The only place he’s in Family Medicine ( I think) is on the Doctors Hospital website. Is he like the Surgeon General equivalent of the Bahamas?
All I know is I want to hear what he has to say. He was listed as her treating psychiatrist (according to Perper) but all the drugs were prescribed by KE.
It seems like everyone is connected politically, governmentally, or financially to this investigation. Not to mention there is an election on May 2nd that could possible push this inquest to the background forever. (depending on the outcome)
I am keeping my fingers crossed that the inquest goes forward and the truth comes out. (It might be wishful thinking on my part) The more I did into the inquest the more questions there are to answer. Sigh!
When I did the list nearly a month ago, I had dozens of names to interpret and then research. All I needed was a little info to find out why they were on the inquest list, so I could put them on the Case Name List and then others could fill in the details.
I can’t go through all my notes now and try to piece back together where I got all the little bits I put together. I’m working on the 2nd revision and have already added another 100 items and I haven’t even made a dent in the next 50 filefuls I still have to data mine.
I wasn’t going to get knee-deep in the midst of it until I had my taxes done and that was *just* yesterday. I needed a breather from it all today. Maybe tomorrow I will get back on it and when I go through all my notes, perhaps I’ll stumble on more about this doctor - but I doubt it.
When I was hurrying to finish it the first time, in time for the inquest, we thought it would be the next day, so I kept the research on each one to a minimum. I gathered lots of notes, but just condensed it to one line or less, where I could.
I know I’ve missed appprox. 1000 posts on this thread and about 500 in the first one, so maybe someone else did all the in-depth research on those people I listed. I wouldn’t know where all that is, to link to. Also, I don’t have my notes on CD, just in files - and no way to search through all of them, except to open each filepage and do a manual search. Ugh!
I have little to go on with Bahamian people, except all the newspaper archives and any anecdotal things I find. I remembered that stuff about Barrett being a gold medalist and something about his leading school plays with children a long time ago.
I also remember there were 4 different Timothy Barretts who are doctors, so I had to make certain the info was Bahamian - and then check the Tim and Timmy Barretts, as several Bahamian sites called him both.
That was way more in-depth than I wanted to go at the time, as we were going to find out within days who he was and more about him. I’ve had no curiosity about this man since then, nor anyone else who already has a listing on my CNL. I have 1000s of people to try to pin down descriptions for, before the May 30th inquest.
However, I do hope to have my 3rd CNL done within this week - *hope, hope*.
And, he had to be chastised several times for acting the part of a lawyer, when he was not recognized as such in that august gathering, lol.
Scott Peck’s “People of the Lie” also has a lot about it in more everyday language and examples. I have only read a few excerpts of “Mask of Sanity,” but know I would like it.
Which reminds me, I try to always put up the newest lawyers’ profiles when mentioned, but others had started doing it, so I slacked off.
I didn’t see anyone else put up the legal info on the latest laswyer name, except that he’s Britney Spears’ lawyer. Here’s the profile:
~~~~~~
Martin Dori Singer - #78166
Current Status: Active
This member is active and may practice law in California.
Profile Information
Bar Number 78166
Address Lavely & Singer
2049 Century Park E #2400
Los Angeles, CA 90067-2906 Phone Number (310) 556-3501
Fax Number Not Available
e-mail Not Available
District District 7 Undergraduate School City Univ of New York - City College; New York NY
County Los Angeles Law School Brooklyn Law School; Brooklyn NY
Sections Litigation
Intellectual Property
Status History
Effective Date Status Change
Present Active
12/21/1977 Admitted to The State Bar of California
.......
Private Practice Lawyer Profile for Martin D. Singer
Martin D. Singer
Member
Lavely & Singer,
Professional Corporation
2049 Century Park East, Suite 2400
Los Angeles, California 90067
(Los Angeles Co.)
Telephone: 310-556-3501
Telecopier: 310-556-3615
AV Peer Review Rated
Practice Areas: Entertainment Litigation; Business Litigation; Right of Publicity and Privacy Law; Libel Law; Copyright Law; Intellectual Property Litigation; Real Estate Litigation
Admitted: 1977, California; 1978, U.S. District Court, Central District of California; 1990, U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Law School: Brooklyn Law School, J.D., 1977
College: City College of New York, B.A., 1974
Member: Beverly Hills, Century City and Los Angeles County Bar Associations; State Bar of California.
Biography: Phi Beta Kappa; Pi Sigma Alpha. Author: “Regulation of Talent Agents,” 1983 Entertainment Publishing and the Arts Handbook.
Reported Cases: Grammer v. Artists Agency, 287 F.3d 886 (9th Cir. 2002); Harris v. EMI Television Programs, 102 Cal.App.3d 214, 162 Cal.Rptr. 357 (1980); Page v. Something Wierd Video, 908 E. Supp. 714 (C.D. Cal. 1995).
Special Agencies: California Labor Commissioner.
Born: Brooklyn, New York, April 25, 1952
ISLN: 903683720
Web Site: http://www.lavelysinger.com
~~~~~~~
Profile
LAVELY & SINGER Professional Corporation is one of the world’s premiere talent-side entertainment litigation firms. The firm’s practice encompasses entertainment and business litigation in State and Federal Courts, including intellectual property, copyright and trademark litigation, media law, right of publicity and privacy law, defamation, contract disputes, business torts, Internet-domain name law, and in matters before specialized tribunals such as the California Labor Commissioner proceedings and the arbitration boards of the Hollywood talent guilds.
Lavely & Singer was established in 1980 and represents a vast array of clients including a lion’s share of Hollywood’s most famous, celebrated and prestigious actors, producers, directors, writers, recording artists and other individuals and entities in and affiliated with the entertainment industry. We generally do not represent the studios, networks, or major labels, concentrating principally on the unique needs of talent.
Our clients’ legal needs fall broadly into two categories. First, we represent clients against the tabloids and other media and internet outlets in disputes which arise prior to, as well as after, the publication of articles which defame the clients or invade their privacy. We also police the manner in which the names and likenesses of our clients are commercially exploited throughout the world. Second, we represent clients in the resolution and litigation of a broad range of entertainment industry disputes including copyright and other intellectual property disputes, contract breaches, and business torts.
Reported cases include: Catherine Zeta-Jones v. Spice House, 372 F. Supp. 2d 568 (C.D. Cal. 2005); Arnold Schwarzenegger v. Fred Martin Motor Co., 374 F.3d 797 (9th Cir. 2004); Kelsey Grammer v. CAA, 287 F.3d 886 (9th Cir. 2002); Cusano v. Klein, 196 F. Supp. 2d 1007 (C.D. Cal. 2002); La Cienega Music Co. v. ZZ Top, 53 F.3d 950 (9th Cir. 1995); Wood Newton v. Harry Thomason, 22 F.3d 1455 (9th Cir. 1994); Playboy Enterprises, Inc. v. Terri Welles, 7 F.Supp.2d 1098 (S.D. Cal. 1998); Charles P. Caudle v. Harry. Thomason, 992 F.Supp. 1 (D.D.C. 1997); Bettie Page v. Something Weird Video, 908 F.Supp. 714 (C.D. Cal. 1995); Gould v. Maryland Sound Industries, Inc., 31 Cal.App.4th 1137 (1995); Robert Selleck v. Globe International, Inc., 166 Cal.App.3d 1123, 212 Cal.Rptr. 838 (1985); Richard Pryor v. David McCoy Franklin, California Department of Industrial Relations, Division of Labor Standards Enforcement, Labor Commissioner, Case No. TAC 17 MP114; Bo Derek v. Karen Callan, California Department of Industrial Relations, Division of Labor Standards and Enforcement, Labor Commissioner, Case No. TAC 18 80SFMP82-80.
Lavely & Singer is committed to providing its clients with the highest level of professional services in the dynamic and ever-changing field of entertainment litigation.
A further profile of the firm’s practice, as well as firm co-founders Marty Singer and Jay Lavely, each named to both the Daily Journal’s 2006 and 2005 lists of the “Top 100 Attorneys in California”, can be found in:
“Raging Bulls: When It’s Time for the Gloves to Come Off, These Attack Dogs of L.A. Law Get the Call,” by Ross Johnson, Los Angeles Magazine, May 2000.
“Court Appeal,”- “Marty Singer makes a career out of un-caging celebrity song-birds,” LA Confidential Magazine, Summer 2003.
“Arnold’s Bouncer” - “Schwarzenegger’s long-time attorney ... Singer has gained a national reputation for representing actors and other talent ...,” The American Lawyer Magazine, December 2003.
~~~~~~
RAGING BULLS
Los Angeles Magazine
Issue: May, 2000
Author: Ross Johnson
When it’s time for the gloves to come off,
these attack dogs of L.A. law get the call . . .
[text omitted]
Marty Singer is the all-around bad cop for stars from Bruce Willis and Arnold Schwarzenegger to Jim Carrey and Celine Dion.
They’re in the Rolodex of every good white-shoe lawyer in town. Somewhere between the numbers for the Jaguar dealer, Pacific Dining Car and Two Bunch Palms are the names—and it is a short list—of attorneys who are called only in certain situations. Because life is sometimes an easy little 9-iron at Hillcrest—and at other times, it’s a David Mamet play.
When things go bad for a client—and we’re talking off the cliff—the respectable barrister known for his or her brilliant transactional mind, hail-fellow connections and Ivy League charm may have to bring in a different type of attorney. One whose job is to dive into the gutter of a litigious, capitalistic society and win at all costs. In other words, a specialist: one of the pit bulls of L.A. law.
The ladies and gentlemen on the pages that follow are just such specialists. But do not think of them as ogres. Or dishonest. (Nevertheless, they are often called when the opposition lawyer turns out to be one of the 40,000 attorneys in Los Angeles County who is a dishonest ogre.) None of them started out as a favorite-son associate at a big firm. They do not hang out with their clients at the Dorothy Chandler Pavilion or Laker games or the Cannes Film Festival. They are instead a function, and reminder, of something that might go terribly wrong in a client’s life. They have the utmost respect within their profession—albeit respect laced with a good dollop of fear.
What these lawyers possess is the proven ability to go all the way, to a jury trial if necessary, and play by whatever rules are laid down to save their client’s freedom or fortune in a civil or criminal matter. On the other hand, when one of them makes a phone call or sends a demand letter, arguments are often settled quickly ... and quietly.
“Marty Singer is a very nice man who loves his family,” says Priscilla Presley of her own personal pit bull. “But if he thinks someone has done me harm, he is a stealth rottweiler.”
FULL-SERVICE CELEB BILLY CLUB
For years, MARTIN D. “MAD DOG” SINGER of Lavely & Singer has been the all-around bad cop for stars like Arnold Schwarzenegger, Bruce Willis, Demi Moore, Sylvester Stallone, Eddie Murphy, Celine Dion, Roseanne and Jim Carrey. “I’ll make one call to a publicist to check out a tip,” growls New York Post Page Six editor Richard Johnson, “and pretty soon I get a hand-delivered letter from Singer threatening all sorts of disasters and financial damages.”
Singer covers the waterfront when it comes to celebrity litigation. If a contractor is too slow to finish the star’s Malibu pad, Singer will rip him a new you know what. When basketballer Dennis Rodman was sued recently for allegedly manhandling a cocktail waitress, Singer took up the Worm’s defense. (The case was dismissed.) When Stallone’s household help in Miami banded together against him in a lawsuit, it was Singer who caught the case—and quickly spun this to the press: The plaintiffs were “hired for six days through a temp agency” and one of them “showed up in high heels to clean the house.”
Singer, 48, has impeccable credentials for pit-bull lawyering. His father died when he was 19, and he had to run the family’s silk-screen printing factory in Manhattan while attending City College of New York. Graduating from Brooklyn Law School in 1977, his goal was to move to California and practice tax law. But he quickly discovered that L.A. transactional lawyers loved a tough litigator who had no desire to buddy up to clients.
Singer can hold his own in a courtroom—he recently won jury verdicts for Jean Claude Van Damme in a contract dispute and Priscilla Presley when she sued a television producer and publicist who lied about her supposed involvement in a deal they were pitching. But it is Singer’s ability to make prying journalists back off that’s made him so valuable—he charges $400 an hour—to folks who are sensitive about their private lives.
In February, he took on the National Enquirer after it published a false story that Celine Dion as pregnant. (Singer demanded a page-one retraction. When the Enquirer refused, he threw down a $20 million invasion-of-privacy suit.) Last January, the Globe apologized to Singer client Schwarzenegger after publishing a bogus tale about his so-called defective heart valve. When Willis wanted to stop the Independent Film Channel last year from showing a documentary critical of him, Singer got the IFC to quickly abandon the idea, much to the public consternation of those at the channel unaccustomed to Hollywood-lawyer hardball. And a big reason the public heard so little about Eddie Murphy being stopped with a transvestite hooker in his car by West Hollywood sheriffs was that Singer bulldogged the tabs on the actor’s behalf.
Enquirer editor Steve Coz, who shared a dais with Singer when they debated at Harvard’s JFK School of Government, deals with him on a weekly basis. “Marty is a heavy hitter, but he’s reasonable,” claims Coz in a careful tone. “He’s one of the few that ‘gets it’—his clients need the press every bit as much as the press needs his clients.”
Don’t tell that to journalist John Connolly. An August 1996 Buzz magazine article dissected Singer’s rabid attempts to discredit Connolly, who had written a damning piece on actor Steven Seagal for Spy. Singer not only slapped a libel suit on Connolly but also hit him with a slander suit for allegedly making derogatory statements about Seagal while reporting the Spy article. (Both suits were quietly withdrawn a few months after the story ran.)
In his Century City office festooned with photos of his three children, Singer manages a wan smile when reminded of the flap. “That story really made me out to be this mean, ruthless lawyer;” he recalls. “I was surprised how much work I ended up getting from it.”
[text omitted]
ROSS JOHNSON
There are lots of lawyers in this town, but where do you turn when things threaten to turn ugly? Esquire, Premiere and Variety contributor Ross Johnson scoured L.A.’s legal world to find out (”Raging Bulls,” page 102). “Every lawyer is supposed to be a tough guy,” says Johnson, who writes the Public Eye column for the L.A. Daily Journal. “But these are the guys you call when you might have to get into the gutter.” Johnson found that having a reputation as a bruiser is not a bad thing. “It’s a good moniker to have,” he says. “It’s much better to be known as an attack dog than as an Emily Dickinson.”
© COPYRIGHT 2000 Los Angeles Magazine, Inc.
~~~~~~
Whew! You’ve earned a break! Sorry for adding to your workload. It IS VERY confusing re the Timothy Barrets,MD of Perper-dom autopsy report so I hope this helps. It’s not meant to be confusing, if you need all the links I’ve used - mostly from Luvlyness’s posts and/or spin off links from those sites, let me know. I have a hunch you are awash in links. Here’s a summary of what I found:
I think I needed a distraction from the helplessness of hearing about the VT horror and pain and looked into ALL the Timothy Barrett names (there were no Tim or Timothy Barretts) on doc finder and on knowx and on 21 state med board sites. There were 4 Timothy Barrett MD’s or DO’s listed, none were psychiatrists. Also none of those matched by date of birth or graduation from med school any of the data on the ONE Timothy Barrett MD listed with the Bahamian govt site as currently credentialed to practice in the Bahamas. I did the same with Timothy Barnett, MD. — dead ends, specialty and probably age-wise.
The Bahamian site says THEIR Timothy Barrett was born in the Dominican Republic, schooled at USC and WVI,med schooled at W. Indies and now listed as Family Medicine practionner and SO I believe THAT is the same one listed and spelled as Barrett on Doctors Hospital staff in the Bahamas. That is the same Timothy Barrett who has a dozen or more sites advertising him as a psychiatrist or psychologist consultant in the Bahamas, because on some of those same sites they mention his being at community events run by the same groups - i.e. the addiction group, on which Timothy Barrett, MD , psychiatrist is listed as a consultant or advisor. And even more convincing, there are several sites that list him - the Doctors Hospital site and the insurance site where a picture or slide show of him presenting is available and he is clearly the same individual. From photos and slide show, Barrett is pretty tall, looks like a lanky, well-preserved ex-runner, well dressed, slightly graying haired individual.
I also based my conclusions that the ONE Bahamian Timothy Barrett, MD was Perper’s Timothy Baretts, MD on my thought that I doubted Perper would have imported a US Barrett (since there are no Timothy Barrett MD, psychiatrists, or Baretts, MD in the states).
As far as finding stuff, the two Bahamian govt links - on police and govt credentialling (as they call their licensing), the insurance link, and the Doctor’s Hospital link, previously listed by Luvlyness were the most intriguing.
I haven’t figured out how to type them in here, somehow they get simplified and don’t come out underlined and “clickable.”
Good morning AC - just sipping my first coffee when I found your comment:
“””””I’m confused why you went from Team Birkhead to hating Birkhead?””””””
You have confused “disappointment” with “hatred”.
I support Larry’s paternal rights to raise DL.
I am horrified that Larry is presently being spun around in Howie’s orbit.
I support Virgie’s efforts at getting DL away from Howie’s physical and lifestyle influence in any way possible.
I am horrified that Virgie has not been permitted to see or touch her grandchild in 7 months.
As someone pointed out, we do not know any of these actors personally, so it is impossible to assign motives with certainty.
I do HATE Howie;)
sod
Thank you, very well said.
An extremely important point. Not that any of us as observers have any "say" in it at all, but I think it does explain our motivations in how we view some of the actions.
Good morning everyone...missed you all! I had to take a break from the site for almost a week now and have a great deal of catching up to do....lots of reading...but I look forward to discussing what will hopefully be great news at tomorrow’s hearing!! With the media focused on VA Tech, our news will probably have to come from CTV and the net, as the ANS case won’t merit the time of day, in comparison.
My heart goes out to the victims of this tragedy.
Hi KimGG
You should probably skip most of the ‘family feuds’ on the thread...some of us got sucked into tabloid tantrums. LOL
Just stick with Rte’s & luvlyness’ posts - they did ‘real’ work.
I can’t speak for anyone else, but it seems impatience has spawned cranky.
sod
Wait, I took part in the temper tantrum too but I called it “venting” lolol
It all started in the 5901-6000 range of posts I think. (In case Kimberly needs the info).
Good Morning All! :)
Amazing! Your thoughts are mine!
OF course! :-)
“LOL—> it seems impatience has spawned cranky.”
Good line. I’m thinking of all the places I’ll be “erranding at” where I can use it today; I may get repetitive. Hmm, maybe not. Some places, the word “spawned” might not be understood.
Best enlightenment yet.
Thanks for organizing my scattershot thinks. Now I understand what it is I believe and why;)
LOL
I went back and viewed the nanny interviews on ControveryTV last night. They definitely said “Dr. Barrett” gave her an injection BEFORE the funeral and then again some time afterwards.
They also said everyone at the funeral (including someone with the police) heard her screaming, while draped over Daniel’s body, that she had trusted Howard and he was responsible for Daniels death. (not the exact words but you get the idea) They also mentioned that ANS told Howard to get away from her and out of her life at the funeral. She was drugged and slept for the next 3 days. During the times she “woke up” she told Howard to get out and he would try and “sweet talk” her then give her more drugs to knock her out. I guess he was hoping he would “forget” the details? There was a picture of the nanny holding the baby at the funeral so I know she was there.
Anyway, just passing along the Barrett verification.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.