This thread has been locked, it will not receive new replies. |
Locked on 10/13/2007 6:39:17 PM PDT by Admin Moderator, reason:
New thread: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/1910919/posts?page=1 |
Posted on 04/07/2007 3:14:35 PM PDT by mom4kittys
Thread Number 3
There are TWO Riccio’s...The one who did her boob implant and the “dealer”. Wonder if they’re related?
Arrrgh! That be th’ *Cur O’ Th’ Caribbean* ye be speakin’ of?
Happy ITLAP Day to all ye scurrilous scalliwags! Shiver ye timbers and shake yer booty!
Huh? Gerald Johnson is the one with the video HKS is suing over. Were there other implant doctors? I didn’t know about this one named Riccio. First name?
Sod I was just at her website (Questionable Behavior) and it was up and running.
I’ll go back and get some specifics.
Thomas Riccio is the SAME person connected to all three: The Anna diaries, the boob tape and OJ.
Apparently he lines up buyers...then discovers or solicits the goods....from somewhere.
Johnson IS the doctor.
I think Riccio is in cahoots with Howard just like he's in cahoots with OJ.
“”...her website (Questionable Behavior) and it was up and running””
Yes - but she is no longer commenting or daily updating the Anna saga.
There is no link for this information so take it for what it’s worth. I have read from a very reliable source that has proven to be right every time in the past that the
NEW INQUEST DATE FOR DANIEL IS October 30th.
This should be in the Bahamas newspapers tomorrow or the next day if it is correct.
sj good to hear from you again - where have you been?
Writing a book?????? Or filing legal papers????
tee hee!
WooHoo,Thanks seeking justice.
Riccio needs to be looked into.
Just a refresher - Excerpt - see full transcript here;
http://www.courttv.com/chat/transcripts/2006/1102smith-bryant.html
Court TV Host: Didn’t Dr. Wecht say that your source was wrong - that those other drugs were not present, correct? Is there going to be a battle of the experts - and how would that likely be resolved?
Michel Bryant: Wecht is a slippery guy. He first denied there were other drugs then went on to name them. He actually named all four and refused to name another that he says were found in “trace” amounts and might prove to be embarrassing to the family. So there will be battle of the experts because the drug amounts and identities will be clear once the Bahamian authorities provide their report. The only issue will be what combination, if any, caused the death. And is there one drug over another that was the predominate cause of death?
Question from tara: Michel, do you think Dr. Wecht is being paid not to reveal some of his findings?
Michel Bryant: Well, Dr. Wecht said last night on Crier that “he didn’t have a dog in this fight.” But, he was hired by Anna Nicole and was paid by Anna Nicole and his client would rather this whole thing go away. You tell me...does he have a dog in this fight or not?
Question from ladybugg1: Has anyone who also was on the plane flight come forward to make any statements about the flight with Daniel?
Michel Bryant: Police have investigated that angle, but I am not aware of any behavior observed by fellow passengers that would help figure out what ultimately happened.
Question from Julie-CTV: What possible reason would Dr. Wecht have to “lie”? Won’t the official toxicology reports that state the amounts, speak for itself?
Michel Bryant: I truly believe that Wecht was hoping his “findings” (those he first made public before we goosed him a bit) would be swallowed whole by the Bahamian government and they would close this case. However, the government has actually and publicly declared they don’t care what Wecht has to say - they’ll do their own investigation. And they are.
Saca - you will appreciate this excerpt of a Nov. 2, 2006 transcript.
http://www.courttv.com/chat/transcripts/2006/1102smith-bryant.html
Question from TaurusPA: Michel, what’s your take on ANS’s mother talking murder. I don’t agree, but do you believe there are people who do.? Do you think she believes that or has an agenda up her sleeve?
Michel Bryant: I think it makes for great copy, but I’ve seen nothing to suggest Howard Stern wanted Anna’s son dead.
____________________________________________________
Maybe not before Anna was killed - but then no-one saw the advanced planning - except Virgie.
Ask Michael what he thinks NOW because these are NOT unrelated deaths.
My apologies for playing coy with you. In the ANS saga, it’s never good to take anything for granted, so even tho I figured you had Tom Riccio connected to the Johnsons’ implant surgery video, since he was the middleman trying to hawk it, I wanted to make sure I hadn’t missed somebody!
BTW, a few weeks after they announced Howie’s lawsuit against Dr. Johnson, our local news had a litle blurb about Johnson’s wife also being added to the suit. I thought she was on it all along, but I guess not.
The Johnson breast augmentation video slipped past - but I am supposing that Anna signed a waiver to permit the surgery videotaping - for use as an instructional tool?
Then, Dr. Johnson put it up for sale as entertainment?
If that’s the case, then IMO, the doctor was foolish - it’s a shame that HK$ will probably win this fight - on behalf of Anna’s estate. If Anna were alive, she would have probably enjoyed the publicity!!!!! But IIRC Anna is DEAD!
I don’t know if he’ll win or not. He’ll have to come to TX and you know he doesn’t want to do that!
Yep, Anna is finally where Howie wanted her - she can now be or do whatever he says she is or does. Very sad - I hope he doesn’t get away with it.
As usual, we only get Howard's side of the story.
In Howard's world, only Howard and Larry are supposed to make money off of Anna...and Dannielynn.
I would guess the Trim ??? dude got paid off directly "to shut up".
Oh, no....not coy!!....Pssst, pssst said the cat!! :-)
I'd say Dannielynn's Birthday Party supports my thoughts.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.