This thread has been locked, it will not receive new replies. |
Locked on 10/13/2007 6:39:17 PM PDT by Admin Moderator, reason:
New thread: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/1910919/posts?page=1 |
Posted on 04/07/2007 3:14:35 PM PDT by mom4kittys
Thread Number 3
This will be very interesting indeed.
Stephen, Lynn, Klein, La Cava, Hoffman and Puya, P.A.,
Practice Area: Medical/Legal Malpractice; Complex Litigation,Civil Practice; Insurance Litigation; Civil Litigation; Personal Injury; Wrongful Death; Tort Liability; No Fault Auto Insurance Defense; Automobile Negligence; Premises Liability; Products Liability; Legal Malpractice; Complex Commercial Litigation and Investigation, Maritime Law
Thanks to all that have welcomed me. I have tried to post about the attornies that filed for O’Quinn but the post hasn’t come through....Maybe I’m doing something wrong?
Hi Liz!
How dem volers? Sorry, molars?
Looks like we have wrongful death suit(s) from O’Quinn through a back door bluff?
We should never have doubted him! Yah don’t mess with Texas!
It’s possible that the time spent in Florida & Bahamas was used (by O’Q and his investigators) to take depositions and collect evidence. He wouldn’t risk his fortune on a slander suit - he was out to goad the toad - and it appears to have worked.
Go Johnny Boy.
“”””””Thanks to all that have welcomed me. I have tried to post about the attornies that filed for OQuinn but the post hasnt come through....Maybe Im doing something wrong?”””””””
Someone help this new FRiend - she has important stuff to post.
SJ - try using the Mail feature by cutting and pasting to yourself - if it works - cut and past to a ‘Post Reply’.
(b) Enlargement. When an act is required or allowed to be done at or within a specified time by order of court, by these rules, or by notice given thereunder, for cause shown the court at any time in its discretion (1) with or without notice, may order the period enlarged if request therefor is made before the expiration of the period originally prescribed or as extended by a previous order, or (2) upon motion made and notice after the expiration of the specified period, may permit the act to be done when failure to act was the result of excusable neglect, but it may not extend the time for making a motion for new trial, for rehearing, or to alter or amend a judgment; making a motion for relief from a judgment under rule 1.540(b); taking an appeal or filing a petition for certiorari; or making a motion for a directed verdict.
12641. 0:07-cv-60534-WPD Stern v. O’Quinn
William P. Dimitrouleas, presiding
Barry S. Seltzer, referral
Date filed: 04/13/2007 Date of last filing: 06/29/2007
Enlargement in the federal courts is not the same as state courts. Enlargement in the federal courts can mean additional parties to the suit and can also mean a cross complaint.
DEFENDANTS UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR ENLARGEMENT OF
TIME TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFFS COMPLAINT
Defendant, John OQuinn, by and through his undersigned
counsel and pursuant to Local Rule 7.1 moves this Court for an enlargement of time to file Defendants Response to the Plaintiffs Complaint and as grounds states as follows:
1. Undersigned counsel has been retained to represent the Defendant in this matter.
Hi sj...do you have a link to the location where you are getting this? Perhaps if you post the link, we can assist in copying the information.
Sorry no I don’t have a link.
That is all the info I have so far.
Does anyone think that the invasion of privacy part of Stern’s complaint has something to do with the 7 insurance policies?
Hi Liz....how’s the dental stuff going...finished yet?
I have been so busy with Rallies that I haven’t even had a chance to check this thread...I’ve missed you all and I hope I haven’t missed much on the case. I don’t even know when the inquest is suppose to begin for Daniel or if I missed it. It REALLY is maddening that 2 people are dead and I’ve seen nothing in the media for updates. When that gal disappeared in Aruba the coverage was non-stop for a year!! Is KE going to get off scott free? I thought they were investigating her...but I haven’t seen anything anywhere about it. And what’s this about O’Quinn?
http://news.findlaw.com/andrews/bt/sel/20070426/20070426_stern.html
Stern alleges that that “no evidence whatsoever exists” that he murdered Daniel or Anna Nicole. Amid the media frenzy following Anna Nicole’s death, O’Quinn nonetheless connected Stern to the deaths in an interview with Fox News and other media outlets, the complaint says.
The lawsuit says O’Quinn made public statements that Stern “stood to benefit by the death of Anna Nicole Smith and Daniel Smith and that Stern murdered them or deliberately caused” their deaths.
“O’Quinn intentionally slandered Mr. Stern in a calculated effort to gain a competitive advantage for his client, Virgie Arthur, in any dispute she may have with plaintiff Stern over the custody of Anna Nicole Smith’s body, parental custody of Dannielynn and/or control of the estate of Anna Nicole Smith,” the complaint says.
IMO the complaint written by Barth is a poorly written complaint.
I bet Barth is crying in her beer about now seeing the impressive list of attornies for O’Quinn.
“””””....in a calculated effort to gain a competitive advantage for his client, Virgie Arthur....
Stern stood to benefit by the death of Anna Nicole Smith and Daniel Smith and that Stern murdered them or deliberately caused their deaths””””””””
It is self-evident my dear Watson.
I'm sure there are legal means of delving into "beneficiary" findings but I'm only guessing. It may be also that they were in Anna's house in the Bahamas (the one that was cleaned out as per "Anna's wishes"....instead of a safety deposit box...which would be the norm.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.