| This thread has been locked, it will not receive new replies. |
|
Locked on 10/13/2007 6:39:17 PM PDT by Admin Moderator, reason:
New thread: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/1910919/posts?page=1 |
Posted on 04/07/2007 3:14:35 PM PDT by mom4kittys
Thread Number 3
Pesky,
One way is when you see the documents of court cases, such as the ones posted around for this case...
check them for a Case #. For instance, on Birkheads filing you will find -
Case # BC 372018
Los Angeles Superior Court
Superior Court of California
Los Angeles CENTRAL District (this helps a lot cuz there are several ‘District Courts’ in LACounty)
Assigned to Judge Mary Ann Murphy
If you look at hks’s filing of ANS Will you see
Case# BP104575
Superior Court LACounty
and a ton of info including the date/time/location of the hearing
This would tell me to search for LA Superior Court Central District. I would then check around to see if they provide case info online. (some do some don’t, CA is the best State and provides a lot!)
That lands you here -
http://www.lasuperiorcourt.org/
Go to CIVIL because it is a civil case
Put in the case number you kept from the document in the search
you get...
Case Number: BP104575
MARSHALL, VICKIE LYNN - DECEDENT
Filing Date: 05/14/2007
Case Type: Probate Will-Ltrs Test (General Jurisdiction)
Status: Pending
Documents Filed | Proceeding Information
Parties
HOGAN VICKIE LYNN - AKA
MARSHALL VICKIE LYNN - Subject Person
ROSS BRUCE S. ESQ. - Attorney for Petitioner
SMITH ANNA NICOLE - AKA
SMITH VICKIE LYNN - AKA
STERN HOWARD K. - Petitioner
Case Information | Party Information | Proceeding Information
Documents Filed (Filing dates listed in descending order)
06/01/2007 Notice-Hearing (Probate)
Filed by Attorney for Petitioner
05/24/2007 Proof-Publication
Filed by Attorney for Petitioner
05/17/2007 Notice-Petn To Administer Estate
Filed by Attorney for Petitioner
05/15/2007 Ltr-Special Administration-NO IAEA
Filed by Attorney for Petitioner
05/15/2007 Duties & Liabilities-Pers Rep Fld
Filed by Attorney for Petitioner
05/15/2007 QBond-Amer. Contractors Indemnity ($10,000.00 - QUALIFYING )
Filed by Petitioner
05/14/2007 Prob Will-Ltrs Test/IAEA
Filed by Petitioner
“”””Still am clueless to things I see like ping or mark”””
Contact mom4kittys to get on this ANS “ping” list. It’s just a way for posters on a particular thread, or FReepers who are of kindred spirit, to notify each other of breaking news or information. (Like interoffice email lists).
As I understand it, on long threads like this one, posters book’mark’ by posting to themselves. Heck - I don’t know HTML - (and every time I confess - all these patient FRiends try to help) but ain’t gonna study war no more;) All my memory cells are full.
10, 9, 8, 7...........
Pesky.. yooowhooo.. on Birkhead / Opri’s :D
Looks like we have some new dates assigned for hearings
Case Summary
Please make a note of the Case Number.
Click here to access document images for this case.
If this link fails, you may go to the Case Document Images site and search using the case number displayed on this page.
Case Number: BC372018
LARRY BIRKHEAD VS DEBRA OPRI ET AL
Filing Date: 06/01/2007
Case Type: Other Intentional Tort-notPI/WD/PD (General Jurisdiction)
Status: Pending
08/30/2007 at 08:30 am in department 33 at 111 North Hill Street, Los Angeles, CA 90012
OSC-Failure to File Proof of Serv
09/21/2007 at 08:31 am in department 33 at 111 North Hill Street, Los Angeles, CA 90012
Conference-Case Management
Documents Filed | Proceeding Information
Parties
BIRKHEAD LARRY - Plaintiff/Petitioner
COLE JONATHAN B. ESQ. - Attorney for Defendant/Respondent
DOES 1 THROUGH 50 - Defendant/Respondent
OPRI & ASSOCIATES APLC - Defendant/Respondent
OPRI DEBRA - Defendant/Respondent
TROPE MICHAEL L. ESQ. - Attorney for Plaintiff/Petitioner
Case Information | Party Information | Proceeding Information
Please make a note of the Case Number.
Click here to access document images for this case.
If this link fails, you may go to the Case Document Images site and search using the case number displayed on this page.
Documents Filed (Filing dates listed in descending order)
06/06/2007 Petition (AND SUPPORTING MOTION TO COMPEL BINDING ARBITRATION )
Filed by Attorney for Plaintiff/Petitioner
06/06/2007 Notice-Related Cases
Filed by Attorney for Plaintiff/Petitioner
06/05/2007 OSC-Failure to File Proof of Serv
Filed by Clerk
06/05/2007 Notice-Case Management Conference
Filed by Clerk
06/01/2007 Complaint
Case Information | Party Information | Documents Filed
Proceedings Held (Proceeding dates listed in descending order)
06/15/2007 at 09:00 am in Department 33, Charles C. Lee, Presiding
Order Re: Related Cases - Completed
Case Information | Party Information | Documents Filed | Proceeding Information
DAMN!
http://www.tmz.com/2007/06/19/birkhead-and-stern-united-they-stand/
OMG! They LIED again! There are interviews with ANS going way back where she ALWAYS wanted more kids! Anyone remember that one where she even talked about not wanting the “Dad” just the baby? I know it was around somewhere. grrr. I can’t find it.
Hey, thanks for this info and for Post 12341. I’ve saved both and plan to study them!
I don’t know what year it was but didn’t one of her friends say that she wanted a blonde hair blue eyed child to match Daniel? I think it was Jackie Hatten.
Not sure Trisha. I am sure there was something in a video she did. If anyone knows or finds it pls let me know. TIA
My knowledge on JH or any of her appearances is zip. I never paid any attn to her and was busy reseaching more important things at that time.
Nice to get some REAL news instead of Levin’s slanted Larry phone and howie phone calls.
http://www.people.com/people/article/0,,20043035,00.html
Four months after Anna Nicole Smith’s death, a Los Angeles judge Tuesday named Howard K. Stern executor of her estate and Larry Birkhead guardian of his and Smith’s daughter, Dannielynn.
Attorneys will return to court later this year to review Smith’s assets, which Stern estimated at $710,000 but which could grow substantially pending the outcome of a battle over the estate of Smith’s late husband, billionaire J. Howard Marshall.
Superior Court Judge Mitchell Beckloff told the lawyers he was concerned about a clause in Smith’s will disinheriting any children born after her son, Daniel, who died last September three days after Dannielynn was born.
Smith, who died in February of an accidental overdose, left a will dated July 2001 that states that aside from her (now deceased) son Daniel, “I have intentionally omitted to provide for ... other heirs, including future spouses and children and other descendants now living and those hereafter born or adopted.”
Bruce Ross, an attorrney for Smith, said he’ll prove at future hearings that the clause is “extraordinary and improperly drafted” and should not stand. He promised to send copies of Beckloff’s orders to Virgie Arthur, Smith’s mother.
This was the first Los Angeles hearing involving Stern and Birkhead since February, when they clashed in a family law court over paternity of Smith’s now 9-month-old daughter, Dannielynn. Stern participated in Tuesday’s hearing by conference call from the Bahamas; Birkhead appeared in person.
Okay, that is ONE to send to the judge.
TYTYTYTYTYTYTY!!!!
Seriously, I am going to collect these Da** things and send them all to that Judge. Might not do a dang thing except make me happy but I am FED UP
Kim says Anna constantly talked about having more kids: “She wanted five more kids,” she says, “and she had whole chests full of girl clothes that she had been saving over the years.”
Kim was with Anna as a witness when the star signed her last will and testament: “I haven’t recently read the will, so I can’t really say what’s in there,” she offers. “I do know that at the time she signed it, she was sound, mind and body, and that’s what she had intended.”
http://www.etonline.com/celebrities/spotlight/47152/index.html
LOL, You are welcome. Seriously, I hope you do send these to the judge. Go Nature. I would like to join you in the “I am FED UP” camp.
HOWDY!
Here is the list:
PennsylvaniaMom; Arizona Carolyn; Jrabbit; Lizarde; Dr. Scarpetta; A Citizen Reporter; bonfire; Howlin; stlnative; Rte66; Southerngl; sodpoodle; Sacajaweau; toldyou; mewzilla; txrangerette; Xenalyte; TrishaSC; meanie monster; gopheraj; FreedomsWorthIt; RummyChick; mom4kittys; Samantha; GoRepGo; TexKat; maggief; LilyBean; redgirlinabluestate; bria; fatima; Pepper777; WestCoastGal; An American In Dairyland; daybreakcoming; sissyjane; lovergirl; Global2010; Alice in Wonderland; Irish Eyes; paws_and_whiskers; windchime; xVIer; spotbust1; Sarasota; Repub4bush; blueplum; tennmountainman; California74; Wandaroos; Bush_Democrat; wndycndy; GYPSY286; justthinkin; Kimberly GG; KsSunflower; Freedom Dignity n Honor; PeskyOne; Luvlyness; mommya; melodie; shywolf; kcw2007; hedda lettis; TejasRose; uncitizen; TheSpottedOwl; nature
HOWDY!
Here is the list:
PennsylvaniaMom; Arizona Carolyn; Jrabbit; Lizarde; Dr. Scarpetta; A Citizen Reporter; bonfire; Howlin; stlnative; Rte66; Southerngl; sodpoodle; Sacajaweau; toldyou; mewzilla; txrangerette; Xenalyte; TrishaSC; meanie monster; gopheraj; FreedomsWorthIt; RummyChick; mom4kittys; Samantha; GoRepGo; TexKat; maggief; LilyBean; redgirlinabluestate; bria; fatima; Pepper777; WestCoastGal; An American In Dairyland; daybreakcoming; sissyjane; lovergirl; Global2010; Alice in Wonderland; Irish Eyes; paws_and_whiskers; windchime; xVIer; spotbust1; Sarasota; Repub4bush; blueplum; tennmountainman; California74; Wandaroos; Bush_Democrat; wndycndy; GYPSY286; justthinkin; Kimberly GG; KsSunflower; Freedom Dignity n Honor; PeskyOne; Luvlyness; mommya; melodie; shywolf; kcw2007; hedda lettis; TejasRose; uncitizen; TheSpottedOwl; nature
I bet the judge does have questions about the clause in the Will stating that no future children would be included in the Will. He should have examined that for fraud before appointing HKS executor. ANS was alleged to be stoned or drunk much of the time, and I don't think anything she signed or said during that time should be binding. HKS and LB are probably looking to share any money that can be collected from the Marshall's, and I hope they don't get a cent, but have to pay mega bucks for taking up the courts time. I don't want to see DL hurt, but I don't think ANS was entitled to one dime from the Marshall's. She allegedly ignored and mistreated the elderly Marshall, and she only married him for his money...that has been proven in testimony about her. She got plenty from him while he was living, and there's no evidence she contributed anything to the marriage!
should be “someone who”, not “he”. Typing too fast and not checking thoroughly.
I hope I will not be the only one to send a concern with documentation. The more the better when it comes to Judges.
Superior Court Judge Mitchell Beckloff
Stanley Mosk Courthouse
111 North Hill Street, Los Angeles, CA 90012
Be sure to include the case number ;)
Case # BP104575
TY for the list, now what do I do with it pls?
If I put all them in a Ping it flags them to come read is my guess?
ITA about Josh Groban! I have his CD’s but.. even better, I taped his concert off Public TV. Ah, be still my heart, the young man is SOOO talented.
Okay, I am going to test this ping thing. There really is news to read so I hope no one gets mad at the newbie learning. lol
Hey fellow Josh Groban fan! He’s awesome isn’t he? I’ve gotten to meet him a few times and he is an absolute sweetheart.
A “ping” is when you seen the “new posts to you” in red on the forum page. You click on the “new posts to you” and it will take you to: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/my/comments
This will show posts you have posted, posts that responded to a post you made as well as anyone who “pinged” you. They will look like this:
If you click directly on the post number (in this example it is 12,357 of 12,357, it will take you directly to the post you have been “pinged” to or one that someone has responded to you.
Anna Nicole Smith, The Investigation #3
Posted by nature to mom4kittys
On General/Chat 06/19/2007 5:02:56 PM CDT · 12,357 of 12,357
One more thing:
If you look under a post it will say:
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12353 | View Replies | Report Abuse
In this case it means that this response was responding to post 12353.
I hope that makes sense?
Some people post “mark” or “bookmark” so it will show up in their comments page as a placemarker to know where they left off. It comes in handy for the ANS thread since it is so long.
Oh, the list is to copy and paste into the “to” area of a response if you want to “ping” the entire ANS list. Please only use it for the more important posts. (some people don’t want to get pinged for every little unimportant post)
Pesky,
Oh, good idea, I hadn’t even thought that far ahead. I always assume the good ol boys of the court stick together no matter what. My Bad.
I don’t think the Judge has a choice. The clown video wasn’t entered by anyone. NO ONE seems to be contesting this piece of garbage. Judge can’t go on media hype to make legal decisions. He must go according to the laws.
CA has a vested interest in ANS. She filed bankruptcy there and that case is largely responsible for the ‘ongoing’ Marshall saga. You KNOW CA has their hand out$$$$ to capture $$$ via the bankruptcy issues. To date, ANS camp has been extremely successful there and I have no reason to believe all anyone but ANS has dropped dead :O More than that, Bush is pushing for Federal Courts to strong arm in on State cases$$$ Much of the reason why so many across the nation are watching the Marshall case. States DO NOT want to give up their ‘power’ to the Feds. Marshall / ANS case could change to Bush’s wishes to no only ANS estate, but change the laws / courts for my children and yours and our children’s children! Pretty serious stuff. I am no atty but reading what I can to learn and it is a ‘landmark’ many have their eye on holding their breath. It is much bigger than ANS.
I suspect if media influences a Judge in anyway, even though he can’t state such, th it may end up being in the Marshall decision. IF they follow the millions LB has managed to gain exploiting DL, they may be less inclined to favor an award out of sympathy for a baby or ruling against it entirely. Just a guess though.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.