[dynachrome]

Poll is about half way down on the left side.

The editorial with the poll is scary.

[PeteB570]

98% No

Not Bad.

[dynachrome]

Thanks to Gopher Broke for the heads up on the poll. (98% no so far)

FREEP THIS POLL ***PING!*** FRmail me if you want to be added or removed from the Fearless Poll-Freeping Freepers Ping list. And be sure to ping me to any polls that need Freepin', if I miss them. (looks like a medium volume list) (gordongekko909, founder of the pinglist, stays on the list until his ghost signs up for the list)

[Cindy]

A more important question that should be pondered....

"Should those people who do not have a concealed/carry permit have their names be posted publicly along with their photographs?"

While this question (as noted above) is over the top; so are the individuals/groups/organizations who want to expose people who LEGALLY have ccw permits.

[RightOnTheLeftCoast]

I think this is an area where compromise is in order.

So rather than identify who has concealed-carry permits, let's identify those who don't. They should all be required to wear a sign on their back proclaiming:

"THIS PERSON IS AN UNARMED SITTING DUCK AND CANNOT DEFEND THEMSELVES AGAINST A PREDATOR"

Don't you think that's a good idea? I think that's a good idea.

There now. I have contributed to the public good today.

[muir_redwoods]

I presume they would support publishing the names of those who get publicly funded abortions as well.

[leda]

ping ;)

[OldFriend]

This is the threat the media holds over the heads of the legislators for allowing concealed carry permits.

Cincinnati newspapers threatened to reveal the names of gun owners too, if I am not mistaken.

[ukie55]

Au contraire. Because the government handles the permitting, it is everyone's business.

The government shouldn't be in the business of regulating guns. Don't let the criminals know who's packing. Let them find out the hard way.