Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Lizarde

I'm lost.....they need Dannilynns DNA....not HKSs' DNA. Opri totally confuses me..


1,635 posted on 03/13/2007 10:08:56 AM PDT by Jrabbit ('scuse me??)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1631 | View Replies ]


To: Jrabbit

She's trying to force his hand; Stern is already under a court order from CA to give DNA: he just hasn't done it.

Oh, listen to this: Rales claiming Sterns is the executor.

He is NOT -- not until a court says he is.


1,640 posted on 03/13/2007 10:11:28 AM PDT by Howlin (Honk if you like Fred Thompson!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1635 | View Replies ]

To: Jrabbit

Just popping in so if someone has made this point I apologize.

I'm sure they want Stern's DNA because if Dannielynn is not his then Virgie can make a claim on her. Bottom line..they want that child out of his clutches.


1,655 posted on 03/13/2007 10:23:50 AM PDT by TrishaSC (TEAM BIRKHEAD)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1635 | View Replies ]

To: Jrabbit

>>>I'm lost.....they need Dannilynns DNA....not HKSs' DNA. Opri totally confuses me..>>>

I *think* the purpose behind this is that they want to get that 'presumed' father thing off the table. If they can PROVE that HKS isn't Dannielynn's father, than he loses rights and custody of the baby. Why it's easier to get that done legally, than just to push for a DNA test on the baby I don't know.

But heck, I don't understand half of why this is all taking so long. Remember, this goes back to flipping October of last year!!

But at least Larry can have solace in the fact that she was a celebrity. If she weren't, he probably wouldn't have any idea in the world where she took his daughter. She would be anoynomous.


1,669 posted on 03/13/2007 10:37:09 AM PDT by Southerngl (TEAM BIRKHEAD Firm Member: CIO (Chief Information Officer))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1635 | View Replies ]

To: Jrabbit

This is how I am understanding it...

In the Bahamas Stern does not have to submit his DNA to prove he is the father of the baby. But the judge in the Bahamas may ask Stern to do it. One of the Bahamian lawyers said that if the judge asks Stern to do it and if Stern refuses to do it, then that would lead the judge to suspect that Stern was trying to hide something. I think their morals and beliefs are different than ours. In otherwords if this was 2 Bahamian men fighting over the paternity of a baby. The "presumed" Bahamian father would proudly stand up and offer his own DNA without even being asked.
The lawyer also said that there has never been a case of 2 Bahamian men fighting over the paternity of a child before in Bahamian courts.

So Opri is out to push the judge to ask Stern to give up his own DNA to prove he is the father. Of course Opri knows that Stern won't do that but Opri is trying to point out that if he "was" the baby's father he would proudly stand up a give his DNA to be tested against the baby's DNA and once he came up a positive match all of Stern's worries would go away. In otherwords Opri is pointing out to the world that Stern is choosing to take hard road instead of the easy road and why is that?


1,698 posted on 03/13/2007 11:31:17 AM PDT by stlnative (The Queen of Spelling & Grammar Errors! - http://community.webshots.com/user/dannielynnhopebirkhead)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1635 | View Replies ]

To: Jrabbit
not HKSs' DNA

Im my nap sleepy state, I had a thought as I read that. MAYBE they need HKS DNA for something other than the baby. The deaths or ...

1,707 posted on 03/13/2007 11:46:18 AM PDT by gopheraj
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1635 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson