This is how I am understanding it...
In the Bahamas Stern does not have to submit his DNA to prove he is the father of the baby. But the judge in the Bahamas may ask Stern to do it. One of the Bahamian lawyers said that if the judge asks Stern to do it and if Stern refuses to do it, then that would lead the judge to suspect that Stern was trying to hide something. I think their morals and beliefs are different than ours. In otherwords if this was 2 Bahamian men fighting over the paternity of a baby. The "presumed" Bahamian father would proudly stand up and offer his own DNA without even being asked.
The lawyer also said that there has never been a case of 2 Bahamian men fighting over the paternity of a child before in Bahamian courts.
So Opri is out to push the judge to ask Stern to give up his own DNA to prove he is the father. Of course Opri knows that Stern won't do that but Opri is trying to point out that if he "was" the baby's father he would proudly stand up a give his DNA to be tested against the baby's DNA and once he came up a positive match all of Stern's worries would go away. In otherwords Opri is pointing out to the world that Stern is choosing to take hard road instead of the easy road and why is that?
Jean on CTV....win for Stern in Calif. today....judge says Stern is presumed father. Judge says come back in several weeks....he has jurisdiction over paternity and will enforce it....some day....
So, once again, Stern wins. I'm sad.