| This thread has been locked, it will not receive new replies. |
|
Locked on 04/08/2007 12:03:14 AM PDT by Admin Moderator, reason:
Continuing discussion: |
Posted on 03/09/2007 8:53:08 PM PST by mom4kittys
Edited on 03/09/2007 9:36:53 PM PST by Admin Moderator. [history]
Thread Number Two
I think it’s pretty much over. Couple of trolls seem to be going back and forth. I’ve seen worst ppl in the USA typing stuff back and forth. I despise that leet speak. It’s ridiculous...lol
She’s good huh? Every question leads to a better question.
Once again eyes closing - talk to everyone tomorrow night. Carry on!
Dr. Perp keeps saying that most of the drugs were at therapuetic levels. However, as one of Greatas guests pointed out some of those were drugs of the same type. Drugs that are sedatives and supress heart rate. Therefore, regarless of the individual drugs being at a therapuetic level, taken together the drug interactions and/or the fact that some of them were basically the same drugs IS an issue. Why does Dr. Perp insist on perpetuating this “everything was at a therapuetic level” except the CH BS?
Not that the CH didn’t take her life. Just that Dr. Perp is not being technically honest about the other drugs.
Yo!
It’s fairly new in the organic food area, the ingredients are excellent and the healthy pet markets are carrying it. There is only a few companes making grain-free and they give a greater variety of meats in their products. They need a Whole Cat Journal to go along with Whole Dog Journal ~LOL~
Exactly he keeps saying that but never comments on the redundancy does he?
My husbands family is huge (mine is in Ohio). And there are two nephews of ours that could eat the whole turkey all by themselves. You should see me at the grocery before Thanksgiving. Lifting all those butterballs to find the biggest one they’ve got.
They think Marilyn Monroe is buried in Texas?
I don’t understand his thinking — or not thinking for that matter.... if she only had one drug in a family and took it at therapeutic levels and then to CH and died, that might be one thing, but to take multiple drugs of the same type — at the therapeutic level for each drug — is drug overuse and abuse any way you try to spin it.
I believe I’m right...in the report Perper quotes Stern as saying he administered no medicine to Anna that morning nor did he witness her taking any.
The report describes Stern’s account of that morning, not that Perper asked him did he give Anna the CH, but that Stern claimed in his account to Perper that he did not. Next thing you know, he’s off buying a boat and receiving a call that Anna is near death. Eroshevich wasn’t there.
Something more than stinks, already. Perper oughta go back and read his own ridiculously flawed report. Remember, Stern said she was too weak to go to the BR without help, and the CH was in the duffel bag in the other room, right?? DUH!!!
G’nite FWI!
Hey!
He’s sending me sample os botht the canned and the dry food. I’m looking forward to having my kittys try it.
This was the guy who sells BonBon’s sex candy?
He was asked that on CTV this morning by Ashley Banfield — he said “she was feeling better the day before and up wataching TV.” Even he cannot keep his stories straight, because the MORNING she died she was to weak to go take a pee by herself... so ... so what if she felt better the day before!!!!
Good~ I’m glad you called.
That is what is so maddening!
Yes, some of the drugs were redundant, I believe. AND Baden has said most of them in her system act to suppress respiration. On top of which you add the biggie CH. There is no reason to what Perper is saying, that I can see, I agree with you.
No...according to the posts they said Texas. Makes you wonder (if true) if she and Daniel had talked about it. Maybe he never felt like California was his home and HE really wanted to be buried in Texas.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.