Skip to comments.
Freep a poll! (Sean hannity. Is Global warming natural? Manmade? False?)
www.hannity.com ^
| 2-19-07
| Sean Hannity
Posted on 02/20/2007 7:33:37 AM PST by dynachrome
Do you believe in global warming?
Yes - manmade
Yes - natural
No
Maybe
(Excerpt) Read more at hannity.com ...
TOPICS: Chit/Chat; Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: globalwarming; hannity; manbearpig; poll
Considering the weather lately, bring it on!
To: A knight without armor; Alexander Rubin; AmericaUnite; Atlanta Conservative; Aussie Dasher; ...
Thanks to Gopher Broke for da ping!
FREEP THIS POLL ***PING!*** FRmail me if you want to be added or removed from the Fearless Poll-Freeping Freepers Ping list. And be sure to ping me to any polls that need Freepin', if I miss them. (looks like a medium volume list) (gordongekko909, founder of the pinglist, stays on the list until his ghost signs up for the list)
2
posted on
02/20/2007 7:34:41 AM PST
by
dynachrome
("Where am I? Where am I going? Why am I in a handbasket?")
To: dynachrome
Not only "No," but "Hell No!"
3
posted on
02/20/2007 7:35:23 AM PST
by
dfwgator
(The University of Florida - Championship U)
To: dynachrome
Results: Do you believe in global warming?
1. |
Yes - manmade |
6.37% |
|
2. |
Yes - natural |
41.44% |
|
3. |
No |
46.96% |
|
4. |
Maybe |
5.23% |
|
4
posted on
02/20/2007 7:38:05 AM PST
by
EndWelfareToday
(Live free and keep what you earn. - Tancredo or Hunter)
To: dynachrome
Yeah it's manmade... made-up by a bunch of commies.
5
posted on
02/20/2007 7:40:38 AM PST
by
johnny7
("We took a hell of a beating." -'Vinegar Joe' Stilwell)
To: johnny7
LOL. Too bad that they don't know about the qualifications of those who vote.
I'd like to see a poll of actual meteorologists.
6
posted on
02/20/2007 7:43:32 AM PST
by
metmom
(Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
To: xcamel
7
posted on
02/20/2007 7:44:38 AM PST
by
metmom
(Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
To: dynachrome; Killing Time; Beowulf; Mr. Peabody; Mrs. Don-o; RW_Whacko; honolulugal; SideoutFred; ...
Poll -- 'have at it'
8
posted on
02/20/2007 8:04:08 AM PST
by
xcamel
(Press to Test, Release to Detonate)
To: dynachrome
Rudy want to aggressively go after the perpertrators of global warming. And I don't mean the phony scientists.
9
posted on
02/20/2007 8:11:37 AM PST
by
pissant
To: dynachrome
1. Yes - manmade 6.37%
2. Yes - natural 41.47%
3. No 46.94%
4. Maybe 5.22%
10
posted on
02/20/2007 8:23:53 AM PST
by
george76
(Ward Churchill : Fake Indian, Fake Scholarship, and Fake Art)
To: xcamel
Poll...
No
Thanks for the Ping
11
posted on
02/20/2007 8:51:54 AM PST
by
libertarian27
(The Boston Tea Party wasn't just about the Tea)
To: dynachrome; xcamel; neverdem; NicknamedBob; liberallarry
The fallacy of :polls" like this - REGARDLESS of whether Hannity, Rush, Boortz, or Creighton or Gore or the Man in the Moon is responsible! - is that the ACTUAL cause of what little global warming we have measured ISN'T a "opinion" question: it either comes FROM something, some physical process and IS causing a measurable change; or it DOES NOT come from some physical process or DOES NOT cause significant changes.
Second: IF (big IF) the change exists, and IF it comes from a physical process, the next question - again, NOT an opinion question! - is whether we can do anything to affect that physical process. (Note: The statement specifically is whether we "can do anything" NOT "should do" anything...)
Third: And, at this point, opinions can begin to be stated, but not until the first two are decided. "Should" we (America, most specifically and only, at least in the eyes of the liberals) do something?
We "can do" many things, but those things may, or may not work - and most will most certainly NOT have any worthwhile result on global warming. Almost ALL that the liberals want to do about global warming only destroys the US economy.
Third:
12
posted on
02/20/2007 9:11:07 AM PST
by
Robert A Cook PE
(I can only donate monthly, but Hillary's ABBCNNBCBS continue to lie every day!)
To: Robert A. Cook, PE
"Almost ALL"
I would remove the "almost"
Global warming is cover for the socialists to grab power.
(From the articles I have seen, I believe global warming to be part of the natural cycle)
13
posted on
02/20/2007 9:28:36 AM PST
by
dynachrome
("Where am I? Where am I going? Why am I in a handbasket?")
To: dynachrome
14
posted on
02/20/2007 11:38:06 AM PST
by
rottndog
(While reading this tag, remember Tens of Thousands of Americans are risking their lives for you.)
To: dynachrome
Yes - natural
15
posted on
02/21/2007 12:40:03 AM PST
by
4KennewickMan2Invent
(I didn't pay attention in school, I was too busy trying to learn something.)
To: Robert A. Cook, PE
We "can do" many things, but those things may, or may not work - and most will most certainly NOT have any worthwhile result on global warming. Almost ALL that the liberals want to do about global warming only destroys the US economy.
I agree, none of them mention thermo voltaic cells out on market and how much more efficient they are than photo voltaic. No mention about successful experiments in nuclear waste (specifically reducing the half-life) reduction in Germany or in California (super-collider experiment).
My favorite is the mentioning of how much C02 is emitted by man, but not what percentage it is of the atmosphere (about 0.0005%). Yet, "solar variance" is completely ignored because it would hurt their agenda.
16
posted on
02/21/2007 12:53:59 AM PST
by
4KennewickMan2Invent
(I didn't pay attention in school, I was too busy trying to learn something.)
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson