I have been saying the same. The date of conception appears to be sometime in December 2005 judging from the birth date.
So under Bahama law, Howard likely would have been able to keep the baby if no one came forward that matched the DNA of the baby...except for the problem of the birth certificate with signatures, etc.
Not necessarily. Virgie is already in Bahamian courts fighting for custody of the baby. The Bahamas is a matriarchal society and the courts there might rather see the baby girl being raised by her grandmother rather than by a single man even if he is the bio father. Heard that on CTV today.
I was going by the name on the birth certificate has precedence unless DNA shows another father..and if DNA doesn't show another father then Howard is presumed the father, etc....but that was before the problems with the birth certificate.