My theory-
She willingly had sex with several of the guys at the party (since she did have DNA from several different men), but none of her partners were the accused. She demanded money for the sex and they wouldn't pay, so she later claimed rape and randomly picked several guys as the rapists.
i thought that all of the LAX players gave DNA samples and none of the dna identified in her was from any of them.
Your theory is wrong---The DNA found in and on the accuser was not from ANY LACROSSE player.
Your theory is wrong. The LAX team was tested. NO DNA match.
That doesn't fly either. The DNA tests on the numerous different semen samples found in her vagina and panties excluded all members of the lacrosse team.
You obviously haven't kept up....the DNA did NOT match ANY of the team members ....all of them gave samples of their DNA and none matched the FIVE unknown DNAs found inside her.
The only way THAT theory would work is if there were males at the party who weren't on the team.
You don't know ANY of the facts of this case, do you?
We have "facts". No need for theories. The girls in business. She's a liar and a tramp who has a nasty little history.
This is a more accurate theory:
The accuser had been high on drugs and alcohol, had intercourse with her driver, her pimp, a couple at a hotel and who knows who else, then went to the Duke party. Later, when she was going to be arrested and possibly lose her kids because of her drug use, she used what little knowledge of the law she knew from school to accuse the guys of rape, so she would not have to undergo the drug tests.