Skip to comments.
Astronomy Picture of the Day
NASA ^
| 01/01/07
| T. A. Rector
Posted on 01/01/2007 8:05:19 AM PST by sig226
NGC 6960: The Witch's Broom Nebula
Credit & Copyright: T. A. Rector (U. Alaska), WIYN, NOAO, AURA, NSF
Explanation: Ten thousand years ago, before the dawn of recorded human history, a new light must suddenly have appeared in the night sky and faded after a few weeks. Today we know this light was an exploding star and record the colorful expanding cloud as the Veil Nebula. Pictured above is the west end of the Veil Nebula known technically as NGC 6960 but less formally as the Witch's Broom Nebula. The rampaging gas gains its colors by impacting and exciting existing nearby gas. The supernova remnant lies about 1400 light-years away towards the constellation of Cygnus. This Witch's Broom actually spans over three times the angular size of the full Moon. The bright star 52 Cygnus is visible with the unaided eye from a dark location but unrelated to the ancient supernova.
TOPICS: Arts/Photography; Astronomy; Astronomy Picture of the Day; Science
KEYWORDS: apod
Full size image
here. Dial up warning: 3.4 MB
1
posted on
01/01/2007 8:05:20 AM PST
by
sig226
To: fnord; Number57; KevinDavis; rdb3; MNJohnnie; thoughtomator; RightWhale; proudofthesouth; ...
2
posted on
01/01/2007 8:06:05 AM PST
by
sig226
(See my profile for the democrat culture of corruption list.)
To: sig226
3
posted on
01/01/2007 8:11:39 AM PST
by
xJones
(http://www.gazettetimes.com/articles/2005/03/16/news/community/asheep.txt)
To: sig226
Very pretty...thanks for posting.
4
posted on
01/01/2007 8:17:49 AM PST
by
indcons
(Fellow FReepers - Best Wishes for 2007.)
To: sig226
Nice..One I had not seen.
5
posted on
01/01/2007 8:22:46 AM PST
by
xcamel
(Press to Test, Release to Detonate)
To: sig226
6
posted on
01/01/2007 8:57:09 AM PST
by
JockoManning
(http://www.klove.com listen online)
To: sig226
Beautiful.
Thanks.
Too beautiful to be a witch's broom.
More like an angel's veil, to me.
7
posted on
01/01/2007 8:57:31 AM PST
by
Quix
(LET GOD ARISE AND HIS ENEMIES BE SCATTERED. LET ISRAEL CALL ON GOD AS THEIRS! & ISLAM FLUSH ITSELF)
To: sig226
To: sig226
I'm no astronomy/physics whiz, so I must ask the question...
Do they know for sure that the speed of light is the same in space than in atmospheric conditions?
Poll...
9
posted on
01/01/2007 9:02:16 AM PST
by
sit-rep
( http://trulineint.com/latestposts.asp)
To: sit-rep
All theories and studies indicate that C is an absolute, one of the very few in our world.
10
posted on
01/01/2007 9:36:25 AM PST
by
sig226
(See my profile for the democrat culture of corruption list.)
To: sig226
Thanks for the straight reply... I had my flame retardant suit on just in case!! ;)
11
posted on
01/01/2007 9:45:04 AM PST
by
sit-rep
( http://trulineint.com/latestposts.asp)
To: sig226
I thought this nebula originated in Chicago and spread to Arkansas, DC and Chappaqua.
12
posted on
01/01/2007 9:45:28 AM PST
by
outofsalt
("If History teaches us anything it's that history rarely teaches us anything")
To: sig226
13
posted on
01/01/2007 9:51:12 AM PST
by
Mad_Tom_Rackham
(Well, it's 2007. Time to get ready for 2008.)
To: sig226
Gorgeous!
14
posted on
01/01/2007 9:56:31 AM PST
by
hypatia
To: sit-rep; sig226
It is a constant in empty space. Nothing can exceed the speed of light in empty space.
It does go slower through the air or other translucent materials depending on the refractive index of the material
Air speed is only slightly less than c, through water or glass as much as 2/3 to 3/4 of c.
15
posted on
01/01/2007 9:56:45 AM PST
by
kanawa
(Don't go where you're looking, look where you're going.)
To: sig226
But there are objects that light must bend around in order to continue. Einstein illustrated this as the "bending" of Time/Space. Also referred to as Gravity.
This alone would slow the speed of light over great distances. One would think that the speed of light would vary then, given the distance it has to travel.
(String Theory not withstanding)
To: sit-rep
Do they know for sure that the speed of light is the same in space than in atmospheric conditions? Light is slower in the atmosphere and even slower in water or glass. But the assumption that light moves at the speed of light in the vacuum is very major and is still an assumption. The theory of relativity plays with this concept a lot, so much that you could say the speed of light in a vacuum is not in general the speed of light in a vacuum. You can certainly not make the jump to the idea that nothing can go faster than the speed of light.
To: RightWhale
In Einstein's time, most Scientists agreed that space was a vacuum. But now, there are strong indications that there are dark matter particles driving the accelerated expansion of the Universe. In a vacuum, the Universe would expand at a constant rate, also referred to by Einstein as the "Cosmological Constant". But due to indications in "Red Shift" the Universe is accelerating.
To: PSYCHO-FREEP
It only looks that way because that is what we expect to see. Like a lot of folk science such as that earth's mag field is caused by the iron core, we see what we are prepared to see.
To: sig226
20
posted on
01/01/2007 8:02:07 PM PST
by
Enterprise
(Let's not enforce laws that are already on the books, let's just write new laws we won't enforce.)
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson