Posted on 10/18/2006 2:45:47 PM PDT by zaxxon
The charges against the Duke lacrosse players should be dropped immediately, and the people demanding the dismissal the loudest and most forcefully should be the very people who have made a living allegedly fighting against racial injustice.
I've said this before, but it's worth saying again: Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton should be in Durham, N.C., today, promising civil disobedience until the charges are dropped and prosecutor Mike Nifong resigns.
Ed Bradley and "60 Minutes" should never be mistaken for Thurgood Marshall and the Supreme Court. Bradley is just a TV reporter and "60 Minutes" is just a TV show, but you couldn't help but be moved by the story they aired Sunday night about the Duke lacrosse rape allegations.
The three accused players gave their first interviews, and two of them claimed they had airtight, documented alibis. The accuser's one-night sidekick, Kim Roberts, seems to have settled on telling the truth rather than trying to spin the story for fame or money. She contradicted several of the statements the accuser gave to police.
(Excerpt) Read more at mercurynews.com ...
And then we are surprised why nobody from Duke is defending the players. Of course they are scared. Freedom of speech only goes one way, or so it seems.
http://www.dukechronicle.com/media/storage/paper884/news/2006/10/25/Letters/insensitive.Language.Unintentional-2400648.shtml?norewrite200610251241&sourcedomain=www.dukechronicle.com
Letters
10/25/06
'Insensitive' language unintentional
Steven Baldwin
Print
Email
Page 1 of 1
An editorial that I wrote appeared in The Chronicle Tuesday that was critical of the way the lacrosse incident has been handled by the Duke administration. Although my position is unchanged, I now realize that some of the language I used in the editorial was insensitive and inappropriate. I truly regret that my words have caused pain for some members of our community.
In particular, in the next-to-last paragraph of the editorial I used some terms that I have now learned have racial connotations for some. I certainly did not intend them that way. I grew up in the western U.S. and, quite frankly, associate the terms I used with the western frontier of the late 1800s. I saw a lot of cowboy movies as a kid.
I deeply regret that what for me is a totally non-racial issue has assumed that character. I wish I had used other language; I wish I had bounced a draft of the document off someone who might have steered me straight. While there is room for disagreement on the lacrosse issue, there is no disagreement on the importance of providing a welcoming environment for all people who study, learn and work at Duke. I have spent much of my career advocating for diversity at Duke by supporting the hiring of minority faculty and the recruitment of minority students.
I am very sorry that my naivety has offended any members of the Duke community. That was entirely unintentional and I should have been more careful in my selection of words.
Steven Baldwin
Professor, chemistry department
Yeah and it was an oral final exam.
Tarred and feathered has connotations of lynching? I have never heard that before in my life.
I don't think he folded. He stands by his position. He just seemed to want to say that he had no idea those words would be offensive.
I am not about to touch that one. "Sidewalk inspecting" is as far as I go.
He didn't fold on his position regarding the Duke LAX players. He folded to PC.
Like I said to Baldwin...
"I was a faculty member for fourteen years at another university and I've seen what happens to people who speak out against the prevailing groupthink. I guess this is the point at which you learn whether tenure and academic freedom is actually worth the price you paid for it. I hope they don't punish you too badly."
That's a good point on the use of "crucified". I have never in my life heard tarred and feathered associated with any lynchings. I agree it's just a figure of speech.
It has been a bit tense around here for the past day or so. My personal view is that no matter what language I used in the article, I would have drawn criticism. For some, this is only a racial issue. For me its only about doing the right thing. Even if the boys were guilty (which they're not) they deserve better treatment from Duke.
(from a post by the official FODU spokesman)
http://forums.talkleft.com/index.php?topic=465.0
"...I am posting here for the first time because the assertion made by Brodheads assistant that the Duke administration has been in regular contact with them and their families and offering considerable support is so absolutely outrageous that I believe you should know the facts.
Brodhead and the rest of the administration have had no contact with any of the lacrosse players or their families whatsoever with the following three exceptions:
(snip)
3. Colin Finnertys parents contacted Brodhead to ask for permission to transfer credits from other colleges. Both Colin and Reade Seligmann are taking classes this semester at colleges near their homes. However, Duke will not let them transfer more than two courses so they are unable to keep up with their studies while suspended unless they get permission to transfer more. Colin was supposed to do study abroad this semester, but Duke cancelled that. Brodhead refused to meet with them despite several requests. Finally, the person in charge of the annual giving program told Brodhead that, unless he agreed to see the Finnerties, he would resign. Only then did Brodhead agree to meet them. In the meeting, Brodhead remained intransigent and he and Mrs. Finnerty got into terrible argument. The Finnerties walked out because Brodhead started insulting them.
There has not been a single note, card or other expression of kindness from anyone in the Duke administration to any of the three accused students."
(snip)
Jason Trumpbour
Spokesperson
Yep - most of the victims of this appear to have been Anglo-Saxon.
http://66.102.7.104/search?q=cache:I921a2vf2TMJ:plateaupress.com.au/wfw/ridingou.htm+tarred+and+feathered+custom&hl=en&gl=us&ct=clnk&cd=6
Oh my God!! That sounds awful. I'm really glad the FODU spokesperson let us know.
I have just read a couple of books on the Whiskey rebellion period (circa 1792-95) and it is clear that tarring and feathering was (a) a barbaric, very painful and potentially deadly punishment meted out by vigilantes and gangs and (b) used on government agents endeavoring to collect taxes on whiskey stills in Western Pennsylvannia and their political supporters. I think it is unfortunate that the good professor felt the need to succumb to political correctness. His editorial was reasonable and measured. I suspect that those seeing racial allusions to tarring and feathering are principally in disagreement with Professor Baldwin's position on the LAX case.
This is pitiful, but to be expected from those without the backbone to admit that they failed to act appropriately and honorably. Scratch a pc liberal and you will find an intolerant fascist hiding just beneath the surface.
Will you forgive me if I post a more direct link the the post in question? I almost gave up finding it 'cause I didn't scroll down far enough...
http://forums.talkleft.com/index.php?PHPSESSID=101acddb5f13d55af42a947a215f3346&topic=465.msg24361#msg24361
Here's what I found interesting: "Finally, the person in charge of the annual giving program told Brodhead that, unless he agreed to see the Finnerties, he would resign."
This person, a.k.a. Development Officer, must be getting some significant heat from the Alums. Good.
Always did like Mark Twain.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.