Posted on 10/15/2006 5:52:10 AM PDT by Locomotive Breath
(CBS) The three Duke lacrosse players indicted for a rape they say they didn't commit are indignant over the effect the charges are having on their lives and their families.
In their first interviews, they speak to Ed Bradley this Sunday, Oct. 15, at 7 p.m. ET/PT.
(Excerpt) Read more at cbsnews.com ...
What was I thinking?!
Yeah, and the hip-huggers.
Geez, they were incredibly ugly the first time around. I can't believe the clothing industry has gone and done it to our daughters, too, especially with obesity on the rise big time. Nobody, no matter how good her shape, looks good in those pants. They detract from those with a good shape and enhance every flaw of somebody with a not-so-good shape. They make the waistline look huge, legs look short, and thighs look fat. They add about 20 lbs. in appearance to even the slimmest figure.
Hideous.
As for boomers, lefty boomers and trailer trash are the ones who dress like unmade beds or haven't noticed that everything has headed too far south as well as east & west for them to be sporting styles designed for bodies under thirty-five.
You are correct.
I stand corrected... but you knew what I meant, so I didn't completely blow it! ;)
Monks is indeed a spoiler, and he has to know it or else he's too stupid to placed in charge of scraping rat droppings, let alone be DA. Someone should throw a net over that idiot. I guess he doesn't realize that if Liefong wins as a result of s split vote, which is quite likely, he is about to become the most reviled man in Durham County, and ridiculed even by those who benefit from the split - just for being so grossly stupid to play into their hands. What a colossal moron. Nobody can shoot himself in the foot like a Republican, and manage to splatter everyone around him with the mess.
You're such a nice person I hated to even do that but the pedant in me took over. I hope you can forgive.
Nope, I believe it is a simple plurality wins. That is the candidate with the most votes wins and their is no run off in the general. As far as I know Louisianna were there are no primaries and everyone runs together in the general is the only state with runoff general elections. But there may be others I don't know about.
WHO in the hell created this ballot? Wait, don't tell me. Let me guess.
What could possibly be the reason for instruction D? Why would they require a voter to fill in an oval for somebody they DO NOT intend to vote for in order to make their vote valid for the person they intend to vote for?
Direction D seems pretty clear to me. If you want to vote a write in you must both write in the name and fill in the bubble.
That's the way I read it, but I'll read it again because LB says it only applies to multi-seat races. I hope he's right. I'll read it again later. What LB is saying makes more sense than what it SEEMS to say at a first reading.
http://blogs.newsobserver.com/ruth/index.php?title=from_liestoppers&more=1&c=1&tb=1&pb=1
[blush]
Loved the "St. Precious", "air-brushed", etc.. Good stuff, LB! :>
http://durhamwonderland.blogspot.com/2006/10/seligmann-speaks-out.html
Well "hagiography" was a vocabulary word in high school and 30 years later I finally got to use it so "St. Precious" fit right in. I wonder if Ruth's running for her dictionary?
Three paragraphs was enough for me.
I presume the families and their civil lawyers are keeping book on this stuff.
LOL! :>
From Duke in Wonderland
"Rosenberg dismissed my request—commenting that only extremist advocates of the economic status quo could say anything positive about the lacrosse players."
___________________________________________________
First of all, What the hell is that? Not just a PC socialist race-baiting loony left whacko academic but a Red PC socialist race-baiting loony left whacko academic
add "in his private jet."
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.