I think people are always tired of war.
But we dont have the luxury to let that prevent victory, then or now.
Which war?
I think the biggest difference is the fact that we used to fight wars as a nation. We rationed resources, bought war bonds and grew victory gardens. Today we send soldiers to fight then complain when things don't go the way we want.
Yes, they were. By that point, the war had gone on for over three years, and we'd just fought bloody campaigns for Aachen, the Ardennes, and the Philippines. Japan had just started using kamikaze tactics a few months earlier. As far as America could tell, we had at least another two years of war left, and that the last year on Japanese soil would be the bloodiest.
Read the book and you will find out that the narrator is correct and that Clint Eastwood did not go liberal on us.
The book is one of the best I have ever read and, yes, after four years, Americans were tired of war. The photo, and the stories of heroism on Iwo, energized the country to finish things without losing hope. Before the "photo," the War Dep't was concerned that the next bond drive would raise enough money for the next phase. But Americans were so enthused by the Iwo stories, and the heroes, that the bond drive exceeded its goals significantly.
Remember, no one knew in February 1945 that the war would be over in six months. Everyone expected a costly and bloody invasion of Japan by November.
Suggest you get the book at the library and read it before the movie. It will not spoil the movie and you will understand better the context for the movie.
Final note -- do not read anything else by the book author, James Bradley, especially his second book, "Flyboys." He is a product of the sixties generation and spent his formative years in Japan as a leftist. His political leanings do not really come out in "Flags" but in "Flyboys" all his moral relativism spews forth, and he equates Japan's evil with America's own conduct during WWII. I think the reason he got away with it is he had no adult supervision when writing the book. "Flags" was Bradley's first book and written with a co-author, an expert on WWII. "Flyboys" was written on his own.
If you think 1940s America was filled with women happy about their husbands/boyfriends/sons being thousands of miles away eating shrapnel, you have been the victim of postwar revisionism.
The good news is that the kids at Ain'titcool news hated it because it was too confusing...so it probably will not be a hit, but I suspect Hollywood will give it oodles of awards.
There was a real isolationist movement headed up by Charles Lindberg, and had Joe Kennedy Sr. as core believers.
There was even a H.R. Bill 1776 that called for us to be independent of European hostilities and remain neutral.
Is your tailer a traiter?