Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Hot-tub sex not a guilty pleasure, judge says
Daily Southtown ^ | September 29, 2006 | Lauren FitzPatrick

Posted on 10/02/2006 9:34:20 AM PDT by Snickering Hound

The verdict came out as swiftly as a jacuzzi jet: Sexual freedom lives on in the leafy back yards of Lockport.

Will County Circuit Judge Marilee Viola had barely finished hearing closing arguments when she ruled that a 38-year-old lieutenant for the Cook County sheriff's police and her 22-year-old lover did not violate a public indecency statute when they canoodled in the buff in her pink backyard hot tub.

Backyard hot tubs aren't public places, even if teenage neighbors are able to see them, Viola said in acquitting the once-openly amorous couple.

"Common sense tells you those (sexual acts) occurred. But I'm not sure the evidence established this is a public place," the judge continued. "This is a backyard residence; this is a private residence."

Kelly Mrozek, the hot tub's owner, and Mark Sumner, of Orland Park, had faced up to a year in jail on a single count of misdemeanor public indecency, and stood trial for two days for engaging in sexual behavior in what prosecutors called a public place.

Mrozek testified on her own behalf that she and Sumner lay nude in the tub around 4 p.m. on Nov. 3, 2005, but didn't have sex. She also insisted she wasn't drunk on two "Bacardi and diet" cocktails, as a Lockport officer testified.

Before she left the house in nothing but a towel, "I looked around, and there was nobody out at all," she said.

"As long as you attempt in every way to be private in your own yard and make sure no one sees your actions, you should be able to do whatever you want in your own home," her attorney Marty Dolan said, arguing that the case was an overblown dispute among neighbors.

The fight began, he said, after Mrozek had cars belonging to Nash visitors ticketed for blocking her driveway and mailbox.

He accused Cheryl Nash, who lives next to Mrozek in the 1100 block of Treeline Drive, of complaining to police until February -- when the couple were charged -- about the myriad naked acts she, her then-14-year-old son and another neighbor witnessed that November day from their home computer room and their back deck.

"Instead of giving the defendant her day in court, we have to give the Nashes their day in court," Dolan said. "The only, only, only reason we're here is because (Mrozek's) a Cook County sheriff."

Mrozek, an 11-year-veteran of the Cook County sheriff's police who has worked under cover on the vice squads, has been moved to desk duty pending an internal investigation, according to a sheriff's spokesman. Her future with the department should come out in a few weeks; meanwhile, she took unrelated medical leave, he said.

Will County prosecutors had accused Mrozek and Sumner of having sex outside in broad daylight.

"Hey, let's get naked and into a hot tub -- it's 4 o'clock, why not?" Assistant State's Attorney Daniel Walsh told the judge, mocking Mrozek's cavalier attitude toward her actions.

The problem was, Walsh argued, the tub also could be seen from the front sidewalk, even the street, where it sits in the corner of the yard, surrounded by a low slatted fence.

But neighbors along the street of sided duplexes and weathered wood fences didn't seem to care, either.

A young man smoking outside a house a few doors up the street said, "On her property, (Mrozek) should be able to do whatever she wants."

A 28-year-old mother of two tiny children at the other end of the street didn't want her boys exposed to nudie neighbors.

"I personally don't care, but I don't live next door to them," Laura Hidalgo said.

But otherwise, she said, "It's their business, their back yard."

And a woman across the curved subdivision street called the whole affair "silly."

"I think there are more important things for people to worry about," Jeanne Dominguez said.

The Nash parents left the courthouse quietly. Afterward, Cheryl Nash said police had warned her against confronting her neighbor directly.

"She's my neighbor, but this is my family," Nash said of her decision to dial 911. "I didn't need to see that.

"I never ever go out in my yard naked and do that to my neighbors because that is just disgusting."

Son Bobby Nash, who was 14 and just home from Lockport High School when he witnessed hot-tub love in the afternoon, also is upset he had to testify Wednesday in front of everyone against the woman whose driveway he used to shovel.

"It was so traumatic for my son, but they needed him to testify," Nash said. "He went through all this aggravation and stress for nothing."

She and her neighbor who shares a border with Mrozek on the other side, said the problems began years ago, with fights over loud music and fences.

Robbin Garrett, who leaned way back on the stand Wednesday to demonstrate the position she saw Sumner assume from Nash's deck, said she couldn't believe the verdict.

"It was shocking," Garrett said. "I don't think anybody could believe the judge could say she wasn't guilty. That was just overwhelming."

Then Garrett joked about her own plans for the evening, looking at a possible plus from the verdict -- a leisurely sunset skinny dip in her own above-ground pool.


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-68 next last

1 posted on 10/02/2006 9:34:23 AM PDT by Snickering Hound
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Snickering Hound
At least they weren't smoking in the hot tub...
2 posted on 10/02/2006 9:38:12 AM PDT by LongElegantLegs (You can do that, and be a whack-job pedophile on meth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Snickering Hound
The fight began, he said, after Mrozek had cars belonging to Nash visitors ticketed for blocking her driveway and mailbox.


I was on the side of the bathers, until I saw that this was just another privelege-abusing LEO.
3 posted on 10/02/2006 9:38:15 AM PDT by Atlas Sneezed (Your FRiendly FReeper Patent Attorney)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Snickering Hound
"Hey, let's get naked and into a hot tub -- it's 4 o'clock, why not?" Assistant State's Attorney Daniel Walsh told the judge, mocking Mrozek's cavalier attitude toward her actions.

Beats watching Oprah.

4 posted on 10/02/2006 9:38:50 AM PDT by Millee (A joke then, a joke N.O.W.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Snickering Hound

Pictures would be needed to pass any judgement.


5 posted on 10/02/2006 9:39:28 AM PDT by SteveMcKing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Snickering Hound

Pitchers?


6 posted on 10/02/2006 9:39:39 AM PDT by Revolting cat! ("In the end, nothing explains anything!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Snickering Hound
What a waste of public money because of a few nosey neighbors One thing the article doesn't mention if the idiot neighbor ever takled to the deputy about what she saw or heard and to ask her to be a bit more discreet. And I am sure the 14 year old kid wasn't traumatized after the first or second or third time watching the woman have sex. It was probably the mother who caught him wacking off while watching her that started this whole lawsuit.
7 posted on 10/02/2006 9:39:51 AM PDT by MAD-AS-HELL (How to win over terrorist? KILL them with UNKINDNESS.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Snickering Hound

So now we must redefine "private" to include bare naked frolicking where the neighbors can see you?


8 posted on 10/02/2006 9:42:09 AM PDT by King Black Robe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Snickering Hound

canoodling?.....there's a new on on me........does it have anything to do with cannoli?......


9 posted on 10/02/2006 9:42:14 AM PDT by Red Badger (Is Castro DEAD YET?........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Beelzebubba

So it is wrong to have a car ticketed that is blocking your drive? Seems like the right answer to me, if you can't resolve the problem by talking. My neighbors don't have the right to block the access to my drive....


10 posted on 10/02/2006 9:43:12 AM PDT by 2nsdammit (By definition it's hard to get suicide bombers with experience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Snickering Hound
defendant on left. Guilty!


11 posted on 10/02/2006 9:43:40 AM PDT by pissant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Snickering Hound
The fight began, he said, after Mrozek had cars belonging to Nash visitors ticketed for blocking her driveway and mailbox.

Sounds like she was begging for a complaint, throwing her weight around like that with one of her neighbors.

12 posted on 10/02/2006 9:44:12 AM PDT by wideawake ("The nation which forgets its defenders will itself be forgotten." - Calvin Coolidge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2nsdammit

My neighbors don't have the right to block the access to my drive...



Indeed, but if you aren't a cop, you probably won't be able to pull strings and have them ticketed just like that, either.


13 posted on 10/02/2006 9:44:48 AM PDT by Atlas Sneezed (Your FRiendly FReeper Patent Attorney)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Xenalyte

Salacious ping list?


14 posted on 10/02/2006 9:44:58 AM PDT by CholeraJoe (USAF Air Rescue "That others may live.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: King Black Robe

Maybe one could turn around and look in the other direction?


15 posted on 10/02/2006 9:45:09 AM PDT by zendari
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Snickering Hound

The bird with feathers of blue
Is waiting for you
Back in your own backyard
You'll see your castles in Spain
Through your window pane
Back in your own backyard
Oh you can go to the East
Go to the West
But someday you'll come
Weary at heart
Back where you started from
You'll find your happiness lies
Right under your eyes
Back in your own backyard


16 posted on 10/02/2006 9:46:43 AM PDT by Southside_Chicago_Republican (Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new and there you will find things only evil and inhuman)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Beelzebubba
"I was on the side of the bathers, until I saw that this was just another privelege-abusing LEO."

So she should be guilty because she is a cop? Nice to see someone with such strong principles.
17 posted on 10/02/2006 9:47:00 AM PDT by MPJackal ("If you are not with us, you are against us.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Revolting cat!; Snickering Hound
Pitchers?

They're not in a hot tub... but they're hot. :)

18 posted on 10/02/2006 9:48:24 AM PDT by MarineBrat (Muslims - The "flesh eating bacteria" version of humans.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: MPJackal

So she should be guilty because she is a cop? Nice to see someone with such strong principles.



I should have said that my sympathies were with the bather. My sympatihes have shifted, though my principles haven't.


19 posted on 10/02/2006 9:49:11 AM PDT by Atlas Sneezed (Your FRiendly FReeper Patent Attorney)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: CholeraJoe

Just damn,...no hot tubs in my regulated neighborhood....


20 posted on 10/02/2006 9:50:07 AM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach (History is soon Forgotten,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-68 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson