Hardly. Reassertions of an unsubstantiated nature do not make for a refutation. As you and your cheerleaders are so fond of saying, "Saying it is so does not make it so." In no way has intelligent design been scientifically shown to be supernatural. Nor has the connection between intelligent design and intelligibility been scientifically challenged in the slightest.
Furthermore, the very existence of chemicals that behave according to laws is ample evidence of intelligent design. For reasons only a brainwashed philosopher would understand, you and your cheerleaders continually mistake the results of intelligent design for intelligent intervention at every point. Who's being childish here? I thought you knew better. Even a child knows a shovel doesn't have brains but is organized to perform a specific function and hence might be a product of intelligent design.
It's not that you do not have patience, but that you do not have substance to your arguments. Hence the liberal spouting forth of ad hominem on your part.
These statements are enough to ignore you from here on out. Your fimgers in your ears and intoning "nya nya nya" indicate you are willfully ignorant and have every intention of staying that way.