Posted on 07/31/2006 7:21:54 PM PDT by jmoo
click on the 'Find it here' .pdf to see the ABN campaign press release.
Not only one on ones, but if you read her boyfriends/drivers testimony, after they checked into the hotel room together, they ordered Chinese food, ate it, and then they had intercourse while they waited for her client. I can provide the link to this if you want.
BTW, with regards to that article, I have no problem with my attitude towards strippers. I do not have one ounce of respect for them, period. I don't care what the circumstances. JMO
I didn't know you got banned. It's like a badge of honor!
Yep! The thread is still locked.
What is the point of having a message board if you are going to shut it down any time the discussion gets a little heated.
I think the point is post as if you believed everything NG has to say or we shut it down!
DA Candidate Says He'd Rethink Duke Lacrosse Rape Case
http://www.wral.com/news/9622052/detail.html
It would take him a month to decide what to do with this case???
OMG! What's in the water down there?
I may have missed this in any of our threads, but does there come a time in pretrial business that the defense gets to depose AV?
Not in a criminal case -- unless the AV agrees to be deposed. And that's not going to happen.
The problem over there is the personal attacks. Someone specifically said that what I wrote was one of the most stupid things he has ever read. And then he said, don't you think before you open your mouth. Well, that did it for me and I responded with unkind words......we were both banned!
Looking at evidence? There's a novel idea.I think Durham prefers indictments before investigations.
Why is this idiot Monks sticking his nose into this now. He failed to get on the ballot. He needs to drop this and support Anyone But Nifong and ask all his supporters to vote for Cheek.
That he is even answering questions about whether or not he is a racist shows he is in over his depth.
Sure seems like it.
Must be something in the water in Durham.
Yeah, and none of this stuff is defense spin or alibis or anything--aside from being totally consistent with all physical evidence. Now we have more "DNA evidence"--more evidence that when people do things, live somewhere, have sex, etc. they leave dna behind. Tell me how it happened that Colin, Reade and the accuser left none and the people who lived in the house left plenty and that is consistent with a violent assualt. Dont tell me let the system work, explain it. NObody can. In all the thousands of thousands of hours of pointless babbling, not one person has explained how this could have happened. when pressed, all we hear is that not all rape cases have dna, which is irrelevant.
arrrghhh
Absolutely right!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.