Thanks for the link.. I guess my recall is not as good as I thought..
In the first DNA press conference he says basically "there was nothing found in the vaginal swab to indicate she had any sex with anyone"
In the press conference for the 2nd DNA result when asked if there was DNA from others besides the BF, he states "on the vaginal, rectal and oral swabs there was no other genetic material that was matched to anyone, anywhere"
So, IMO the lawyers either misspoke in the first press conference or the report was incomplete... There would be no other reason to seek a second test.
But the quote from the second meeting does not say there wasn't DNA material, it says there was no match.
I guess I should catch up and figure out what we are really talking about here. Sorry if this is a distraction.